Pros:

• Highly portable (noticeably lighter than any hardcover book I own)
• Durable (Check out Andrei’s scratch/drop test)
• Powerful for the $200 price
• ~8 Hour battery life (I average 7 hours with WiFi on and brightness at a comfortable level)
• Amazing video quality through Amazon Instant Video
• Seamless integration with Amazon Cloud Storage for Amazon Purchases
• Large, well-moderated App Store
• Access to Amazon’s Customer Service
• Easy WiFi Setup

Cons

• Only 8GB onboard storage (6GB or so available, with just over 1GB reserved for Apps)
• 2 Finger Touch screen not perfect for extended typing (not a netbook replacement)
• Back-lit screen not great for reading
• Some Kindle eReader functionality missing (collections, real page numbers, X-Ray)
• No Text to Speech (in Kindle Edition eBooks, though some apps may make up for this)
• No access to Android Marketplace by default
• Netflix video currently only allows SD streaming
• Limited Codec selection

Common Kindle Fire Software Complaints (Including Those Addressed)

• Choppy navigation
• WiFi connectivity limited
• Overly fast browsing/scrolling
• Unresponsive page turning
• No Parental Controls
• No way to choose favoring of mobile sites
• Unintuitive cloud integration for personal documents
• Caroussel Logs Every Activity
• Purchased Apps always present in Cloud view
• Silk Browser doesn’t live up to the hype

At this point, if you are interested in getting a Kindle Fire, I strongly recommend it.  This isn’t exactly a surprise coming from me given earlier similar declarations even before the big patch that dealt with so many complaints, but it remains true.

This is not an iPad killer.  It might have an effect on Apple, and will almost certainly spur Amazon to more direct competition, but they’re devices intended for different purposes.  If you want to watch movies, play Android games, access a wide variety of streaming content, and just generally consume media of various sorts, the Kindle Fire is the way to go.  I certainly wouldn’t replace my Kindle eReader with one, nor would it work as even a basic netbook substitute in the way that an iPad could once you get used to it, but what it does do is well done.

Related Posts

• January 24, 2012 -- Kindle Fire 6.2.2 Details Released (0)
• January 19, 2012 -- Kindle Fire Update 6.2.2 Now Live (1)
• December 14, 2011 -- Amazon Addressing Kindle Fire Criticisms In Upcoming Update (0)
• November 21, 2011 -- Kindle Fire Review (1)

Video Viewing

Trevett:

As far as video, I have always disliked Amazon’s Video services. The prices are very reasonable and they now have a huge selection, but obtaining the videos [was] a huge pain due to Amazon’s terrible Unbox player. That changes with the Fire, as everything is native and streams/downloads beautifully.

Sid:

The video app is real snappy and I had no issues streaming video at home over wifi. I can honestly say that the Amazon video app is as good as the Netflix app on the Ipad.

Billy Radcliffe:

The biggest “unfinished” feature of the Fire is the Cloud integration; the Cloud doesn’t work hand-in-glove with the Fire in the way you think it might. In order to access features like the video or the docs, you basically have to go through a browser the way you would from any other device.

Reading

 J. Gower:

Kindle Fire’s weak spot, imo, and the reason I give it four stars. But to be fair, it was never going to compete with my Kindle 3. E-ink really is just that much more comfortable to read versus a (relatively low resolution) LCD screen

Raghee Horner:

I initially bought an iPad with the idea of using it as an eReader but after 15-20 minutes the 1.5lb iPad feels like it’s ten pounds and simply becomes too uncomfortable to hold like a nice light paperback. The Fire is much more realistic an eReader.

Apps

Michael P. Gallagher:

Speed of the apps as well as reading a book is VERY fast and responsive. I haven’t tried a a challenging spreadsheet or Word document with the Open Office app yet, but then again I can’t think of too many times where (based on my guesstimated usage) I will be doing those kind of tasks on my Fire: I like to keep my work separate from play.

Overall

Dubstep:

I put this at 5 stars because it MET MY EXPECTATIONS. I read all about this device before buying it, so I knew exactly what I was getting for $199 dollars. It has met all of my expectations of a small form factor tablet that is intuitive, media friendly, and has great processing capabilities. I did not expect an iPad, so there is no comparison in my mind.

Comdet:

None of the so-called limitations of the Fire detract from my using it. Yes it has limited onboard storage but with the way the Cloud is integrated, I’ve not had any difficulty using that as a way of storing content. Plus, when Amazon stores it, they deal with the issue of backup. I also don’t miss the 3G connectivity. Sure, I’d love to be able to connect anywhere, but I will not pay the prices charged for data connectivity.

Related Posts

• December 26, 2011 -- Kindle Content Reviews: Reading, Writing, and Understanding Their Impact (2)
• December 6, 2011 -- Kindle Fire Wins Over The Family Technophobes (0)
• February 6, 2012 -- Kindle Fire Now #1 Android Tablet (3)
• February 3, 2012 -- Kindle Fire Video Conversion (0)

Displays: Tie

This part doesn’t matter too much.  Basically any modern eReader will be making use of the E INK Pearl display and the Kindle family is no exception.  Unlike an LCD, you can read on this type of screen with no eye strain in any sort of lighting that would work with a normal paper book. In an extremely minor way the Kindle Touch might be at a disadvantage here since there is a likelihood of fingerprints, but in practice they are surprisingly minimal and don’t have an effect on anything that quickly wiping the screen down every couple days or weeks won’t fix.

Interface: Kindle Touch

The Kindle Touch is far superior in terms of interacting with your books.  If you have any interest in taking notes, highlighting, or just about anything else besides flipping pages while you read, then the touchscreen will be practically necessary.  The Kindle 4′s directional control is fine for choosing a book, but using the virtual keyboard is tedious at best and you’ll find yourself avoiding it quickly.

Storage: Kindle Touch (Barely)

The storage space on the Kindle Touch is effectively twice that of the Kindle 4.  While this might seem at a glance to be a big deal, in actuality it won’t come into play much.  There are only so many books you can easily navigate at a time anyway which means most people hit their limit well before the Kindle’s storage fills up and start archiving titles that aren’t needed.

Battery Life: Kindle Touch

The battery life is also doubled on the touch model by comparison.  Once again, however, it doesn’t much matter.  The cheaper model still gets a month of use in between charges.  When you hit the point where your biggest problem is remembering where the charging cable was after such a long time has passed, it stops mattering much which eReader wins.

Price: Kindle 4

Obviously the Kindle 4′s price is its biggest advantage.  An $80 price tag makes it the cheapest major eReader on the market.

Form: Kindle 4

The Kindle Touch weighs slightly over 25% more than the Kindle 4.  It’s a fairly negligible amount, and both devices are comfortable to hold in one hand, but every bit helps.

Extras: Kindle Touch

Hands-down, the Kindle Touch provides the most extras aside from simple reading.  It has text-to-speech, audio playback, optional 3G, simple PDF zoom and scroll control, and Amazon’s new X-Ray feature.  While none of these is likely to be enough to sell the device on its own, the ability to access audiobooks and PDF documents easily is likely to be important for some people.

Recommendation: Kindle Touch (Mostly)

Basically, the Kindle Touch has the most to offer you.  It does everything that the Kindle 4 can do and more, for just $20 price difference.  This isn’t to say that the Kindle 4 has many problems, because if all you want to do is read cover to cover in your favorite books then it’s wonderful, it just isn’t as versatile.  We’ve effectively reached the point where all new eReaders will be equally pleasant to use for basic reading, so I’m forced to weigh other factors more heavily.  Regardless of that, the Kindle will almost certainly be enjoyed regardless of which one is chosen.

Related Posts

• December 5, 2011 -- Special Offers Now Available For All Kindle eReaders (7)
• October 14, 2011 -- Kindle Fire vs Kindle eReaders: Interface Differences and Why They May Matter To You (1)
• October 13, 2011 -- Kindle Fire vs Kindle Touch: Deciding Which Meets Your Needs Better (0)
• October 13, 2011 -- Kindle Touch vs Kindle Keyboard: Is It Worth An Upgrade? (2)

Now we all know somebody, no matter who that might be, who is either unwilling or incapable of using a computer in any meaningful way.  My family has a couple of them.  I figured that the ideal way to gauge the user-friendliness of the Kindle Fire‘s interface was to get them to take a test drive on it.  The results were impressive. To understand the nature of the reviewers here, it is worth noting that one of them initially refused to even consider it because of how confusing and overwhelming trying to use an iPad was.  I’m told that birthday gift didn’t last a week.

Reviewer One:

It’s fun.  I can get all my stuff by clicking on the word for what I want and then next time it’s waiting on the screen for me.  The buttons for the game look silly next to my books, but if you read a few things they go away.  The best part was the button shelf (Favorites Bar), so that I didn’t lose the important stuff.  The magazines don’t make sense though.  The screen is too small for that.  I think I’ll be keeping mine.

Reviewer Two:

I really only want something to read on.  I tried the old Kindle, but it was too dark for me.  This one is pretty good.  I figured out how to get books from the library and they’re easier to read at night.  I don’t think I’ll ever watch movies on it.  They look good, but the screen is way too small.  I’d rather use my TiVo.  I’m glad they made a Kindle like this that was small enough to read on still.  I’ll probably take it with me on planes.

Reviewer Three:

This one is a lot easier to hold than the iPad.  I know people like that one, but it just did a lot of things I don’t care about.  This lets me check my email, read books, and doesn’t make it seem like I should be doing more.  I’m going to give it a try and maybe even learn how to take it to the library.

Obviously I prompted a little bit there about likes and dislikes, but you get the picture.

In terms of the Kindle Fire‘s simplicity of use, not much else could have demonstrated things better for me.  It’s going to be a common gift this holiday season as a result.  Remember that Amazon has a 30 day return policy for Kindles, making it possible to audition even when you’re not 100% sure that it will go over well.  I don’t think that the family I talked to are getting every possible use out of their new tablets, but that doesn’t mean they failed to enjoy.

Related Posts

• December 26, 2011 -- Kindle Content Reviews: Reading, Writing, and Understanding Their Impact (2)
• December 10, 2011 -- Kindle Fire Review Roundup (0)
• October 14, 2011 -- Kindle Fire vs Kindle eReaders: Interface Differences and Why They May Matter To You (1)
• February 6, 2012 -- Kindle Fire Now #1 Android Tablet (3)

Kindle Fire

This is the clear winner in terms of general usefulness.  We don’t need a breakdown to prove that, it simply is.  The dedicated eReader didn’t rise to popularity because of its exclusive access to the text contained inside eBook files, though.  The question is how this device stacks up specifically as an eReader.

Pros:

• More Responsive Interface
• Larger Storage Capacity
• More Intuitive Sorting/Storage Library Interface

Cons:

• LCD Display
• Short battery Life

It really is a good system in general besides the back-lit LCD, offering the full functionality of any Kindle or Kindle App prior to the Touch model.  When you swap to the white on black color scheme it isn’t even terribly uncomfortable to read for hours at a time, though the fact that you are reading on a screen is never forgotten.

Kindle Touch

Pros:

• E Ink Screen
• X-Ray
• Long Battery Life

Cons:

• Slightly slower than Fire
• More Basic Menu System
• Limited PDF Functionality

The biggest things that the new Kindle Touch eReader has going for it revolve around the strengths that the Kindle line has always played to: a reading experience analogous to that of a paper book.  This includes no eye strain, page turns faster than physically possible with paper, seemingly endless battery life, and the best selection of books on the market.  That last is obviously not restricted to this model, but it helps.

On the downside, the responsiveness of the Kindle Fire when doing things besides plain old reading is far superior.  Both the color display and the simple ability to rotate your document also make it the superior device for PDF viewing.  While the zooming and scrolling on the Kindle Touch is superior to any previous Kindle due to the touchscreen implementation, for some reason this resulted in the loss of landscape mode.  That can be a pain when you’re unable to reflow your document.

Conclusions

When in comes to extended reading, the Kindle eReader is still king.  The E Ink screen isn’t necessarily a deal-breaker for everybody, but the loss of battery life that comes along with the move to LCD is likely to be.  X-Ray is a nice feature and will add some great tools for students and reading groups, but I have yet to find it more than a perk.

On the other hand, for active reference and note taking I would definitely recommend the Kindle Fire.  The reading experience shows no lag for me in about 15 hours of use so far, the page turns, highlighting, and note taking are nice and quick, and it can be useful to have the full web browser handy.

The experiences are indeed distinct, and probably will remain so until some form of Color E Ink or an equivalent comes along.

Related Posts

• December 2, 2011 -- Final Thoughts from DecalGirl (8)
• November 25, 2011 -- Holiday Shopping/DecalGirl Artists Pt. 3 (2)
• November 11, 2011 -- Meet the DecalGirl Artists Pt 2 (1)
• October 14, 2011 -- Kindle Fire vs Kindle eReaders: Interface Differences and Why They May Matter To You (1)

Video

The Kindle Fire was always expected to be a video viewing device and it pulls that off quite well.  Integration with the Amazon Instant Video library is seamless and you can browse through the Prime membership freebies without any trouble or intrusive sales pitches.  Playback is perfect and I haven’t had so much as a stutter or buffering delay in the time I’ve been using the service.  Downloading rental movies goes quickly and it’s obvious how to choose between streaming video and what you have on your device locally.

The inclusion of Netflix and Hulu Plus at launch was a nice addition that effectively shut down the Nook Tablet’s main point of potential superiority.  While I don’t maintain a Hulu Plus account, Netflix runs almost as well as Amazon’s Instant Video.  Jumping into the middle of a half-watched movie resulted in about 2 seconds of stuttering followed by normal playback.  Basically the same experience I have come to expect from the box hooked up to my television.

I would love to be able to side-load more content that I already own onto the device.  At present the supported formats are rather limited.  The majority of my library is incompatible.  Probably, as with the fight over EPUBs with the Kindle eReader line, a way for Amazon to “subtly” encourage adoption of their house preference.  Conversion is much more of a pain for video than it is for eBooks, though, which might make this a major inconvenience for people looking to play things they already have around.

Audio

Possibly the biggest drawback to using the Kindle Fire to watch movies is the limited audio capability.  While yes, it is indeed perfectly possible to listen to music or movies through the built in speakers, the quality is quite lacking.  With a decent pair of headphones, however, it works as well as any audio device I’ve ever owned.  There isn’t much more to say other than that the streaming here seems to work perfectly well for me, even when reading or using other apps.  So long as there isn’t a conflict over who gets control of the speakers, you’re good.

Web

One of the biggest perks of the Kindle Fire was meant to be the new Amazon Silk web browser.  Since most of the work is done off of the device by outsourcing to Amazon’s cloud servers, there’s a lot of potential.  Unfortunately there are some problems.  Most noticeably, there seems to be a slight jump in input lag while using the browser.

I’m told this has something to do with a known problem that Android 2.3 has in trying to decide whether the OS or the browser gets to handle input, but I’m not intimately aware of the particularities of Android so this may be inaccurate.  If it is true, however, then to some degree it is likely a problem that won’t be going away in the near future.

Other than that, things work great.  You do get some small speed increase over normal browsing, which if I properly understand how Silk is supposed to work will only get better in time.  It scores pretty well on HTML5 tests, though not perfectly, and should run most HTML5 apps.  Not much more you can ask for in a browser besides being able to open pages quickly, I suppose?

Apps

This is undoubtedly the most important aspect of the tablet experience for many people, but it is also somehow the one that Amazon has decided to put the least emphasis on.  Yes there are loads of apps to choose from, but not all of the ones in Amazon’s Android Appstore will work on the Kindle Fire.  That makes sense, given the wide variety of Android devices out there, but Amazon is able to put a little check mark for device compatibility next to the purchasing button on their site so I would love it if I could just get a “Kindle Fire compatible only” button.  I’m sure it will happen in time, though.

As for functionality, I haven’t noticed any problems with the apps.  Their icons look a little out of place on the carousel next to the eBooks you’ve been reading recently, but no more so than many movie or TV show icons do. I’ve also had no issues so far with performance.  The apps specifically for the Kindle Fire work slightly better than their more general counterparts, but even those have little trouble and the screen isn’t huge enough to cause much distortion when interfaces get stretched more than developers intended.

There doesn’t even seem to be any major area overlooked by those developers so far, either.  Everything I’ve wanted out of it has been available for a dollar or two. The fact that Amazon has a daily free Android App is also a nice plus.  This isn’t necessarily Kindle Fire specific, but I’ve seen everything from games to office suites up there.  It opened up some options that might have otherwise been overlooked as too expensive to be worth a potentially wasted purchase.

Summary

Overall this is a great device.  It is not a PC replacement, or even a netbook replacement, but for what it was meant to do it works well.  You can purchase and use any content you want from Amazon and it seems to run smoothly.  Picking up media in unfamiliar formats might cause some complications, but even then there are usually conversion programs available should it be particularly important.  While I do see clearly how Amazon is trying to push people into using their services by offering minimal support for anything else, it isn’t nearly as heavy-handed as many claimed it would be.  I feel like they are genuinely trying to convince their customers that Amazon services are superior rather than just saying that you shouldn’t have other options.

At $199, the Kindle Fire is more than worth the investment.

Related Posts

• January 24, 2012 -- Kindle Fire 6.2.2 Details Released (0)
• January 21, 2012 -- Kindle Fire January Re-Review (8)
• October 10, 2011 -- Kindle Fire Review (Pre-release) (3)
• February 6, 2012 -- Kindle Fire Now #1 Android Tablet (3)

This video pretty much speaks for itself, but here’s a recoup of what I tried:

• scratching it with house keys – no effect at all, not even smallest dent
• scratching it with a screwdriver – same as above. Kindle Fire looks as good as new
• scratching it with office knife – same as above. Kindle Fire wins
• drops in various positions from 3 feet onto stone floor – Kindle Fire wins and goes on playing the video
• angled drop from 6 feet – Kindle Fire survives and keeps working
• flat drop from 6 feet – internal LCD screen cracked so we can finally write this one off as broken. However there is still not a dent on the “gorilla glass”
• pound on the screen with a screwdriver and a sharp tool – still not a single dent on the “gorilla glass”

Bottom line is that, it is pretty much safe to carry your Kindle Fire without case or cover in the same bag with pretty much anything without fear of scratching the screen. Kindle Fire is very likely to survive “normal household drops” (from hands when reading, from the table, etc) even if it falls on something as hard as stone. It will probably need to fall in a bad way down the flight of stair for it break.

Bottom line is that Kindle Fire is a very sturdy device. I was surprised by the test results as I was sure that it will fail much sooner.

Related Posts

• June 26, 2009 -- Kindle 2 Drop Test (2)
• June 25, 2009 -- Kindle DX Drop Test (2)
• July 22, 2008 -- Kindle drop test (4)

Kindle Fire at a glance

• It is based on  Gingerbread version of Android heavily modified by Amazon software developers. You can still install 3rd party Android applications and even root the device altogether.
• In terms of size footprint (7.5″ x 4.7″ x 0.45″) is almost exactly the same as Kindle Keyboard but thicker. It also weight twice as much. Kindle Fire is slightly smaller and of almost the same weight (14.6oz) as Nook Color 2. Neither device will cause your arm to go numb after prolonged reading like was the case for me with 1st generation iPad
• Kindle Fire features 7″ backlit LCD touchscreen based on in-plane switching IPS technology. IPS (unlike TN) provides better and more uniform colors regardless of the angle at which screen is viewed. Screen runs at 1024 x 600 pixel resolution (169 DPI which is higher than 132 DPI in iPad 2).
• Screen is protected by “Gorilla Glass” that makes it more scratch and break-resistant. Touchscreen supports multi-touch gestures like pinch which have become golden standard in mobile devices.
• Kindle Fire gives you access to a vast library of content:
• Over 1,000,000 of modern, in-copyright books, most of which are priced under $9.99. Some of these books can be loaded for free for unlimited time from “Kindle Owner’s Lending Library” available though Amazon Prime subscription
• Over 2,000,000 out-of-copyright books
• More than 100,000 moview and TV shows. More than 10,000 of these are available for free to Amazon Prime subscribers (Kindle Fire comes with one month free Amazon Prime subscription)
• Over 17,000,000 songs from Amazon MP3 store. All of these are DRM-free. So you are not limited to Kindle Fire when it comes to listening these. These songs will play on almost any device and can be burned to CD
• Full color magazines that can be purchased as a subscription or one issue at a time
• More than 20,000 Android apps available though Amazon. More apps can be side-loaded on Kindle Fire bypassing the Amazon store. This includes games like Angry Birds, Plants vs. Zombies, Fruit Ninja and many more
• Fully functional Web browser with flash support and accelerated by Amazon Silk technology.
• 802.11b/g/n WiFi to wirelessly download media and browse the Web
• Up to 8 hours of battery life on a single charge
• Dual core 1Ghz Texas Instruments OMAP 4 CPU (exactly the same as Nook Color 2)
• 8 gigabytes of internal flash memory. Although Kindle Fire doesn’t feature a memory card slot like all Kindle devices starting from Kindle 2, it can leverage Amazon Cloud storage.
• Supports email (including Gmail) and working with personal documents and media in the following formats: AZW, TXT, PDF, MOBI, PRC, AA, AAX, DOC, DOCX, JPEG, GIF, PNG, BMP, non-DRM AAC, MP3, MIDI, OGG, WAV, MP4, VP8
• Stereo speakers and 3.5mm headphone mini-jack for audio playback
• USB connectivity for manually transferring content to and from personal computer. Though Kindle Fire doesn’t require a PC and can work as a standalone device.
• Price: $199.00 including one month trial of Amazon Prime membership that gives access to free eBooks and videos mentioned above and free 2-day shipping on select items on Amazon.com

Kindle Fire Ergonomics

In terms of exterior, Kindle Fire is a generic as device can get. It is a 7.5″ x 4.7″ x 0.45″ (190mm x 120mm x 11.4mm) paralelipipid with rounded corners. Front is Gorilla Glass and back is rubberized plastic. It weights 14.6oz (413 grams). Upper edge houses stereo speaker openings, and lower edge is home to 3.5mm mini-jack, micro-B USB/charging connector and power button which is the only physical button on the device. The device is comfortable to hold with either one or two hands either in landscape or portrait mode. There is nothing worth noting either good or bad about the device exterior. It is comfortable and it just works.

Similar to Nook Color, Kindle Fire lacks 4 standard Android buttons: home, menu, back and search. While Nook Color has “Home” and two sound volume control buttons, Kindle Fire does not. All these buttons are implemented in software and pop-up on the screen either by user request or as need arises. Personally I’d love to have at least volume control buttons in hardware. Having a hardware play/pause button would have been an even bigger boon. However “buttonless” seems to be the latest fashion, so you need to get distracted for a few moments and do some finger manipulation to pause the music you are listening to when someone walks up and starts a conversation.

Overall device is comfortable to use, however adding a few additional hardware buttons would have made it even more so.

Kindle Fire Screen

Visual quality of the IPS LCD touchscreen is very good for such an inexpensive device. Amazon doesn’t fail to remind you of this fact each time you power on the Kindle Fire by showing you yet another beautiful wallpaper image.

IPS stands for “in-plane-switching”. It is technology for manufacturing LCD screens that produces brighter and more vivid colors when compared to TN (twisted nematic) displays. Another advantage of IPS over TN displays is the fact that colors look the same regardless of the angle at which display is being observed. Try looking at cheap LCD display (ATM machine, cash register) from the side and you will understand what I’m talking about.

Although Kindle Fire display features higher resolution of 169 DPI than Apple iPad 2 (132 DPI) it is still nowhere near 326 DPI of Apple “retina” display featured in iPhone 4 and iPhone 4S. But lets not forget that there is no way tablet featuring such display and a video-chip to efficiently drive it could cost $199.00 as Kindle Fire does.

Touchscreen latency is noticeably higher when compared to that of an iPad. What this means is that a fraction of a second passes between the moment you move your finger and the moment things start moving on the screen. It wouldn’t bother you unless you were specifically looking for it.

All-in-all, I’m happy with Kindle Fire display and touchscreen despite few shortcomings I’ve mentioned above. Considering $199 price point it is great “bang-for-the-buck”

Now let’s take a closer look at actual day-to-day usage scenarios and see how good or bad Kindle Fire is at getting done things normally expected of tablets.

Kindle Fire Web Browsing (technical stuff)

Browsing the web is by far the most common activity people perform on mobile devices. Ideally one would want to have the same experience when consuming and generating web-content as on the desktop or laptop. Small form factor, limited battery, processing power, lack of physical keyboard and mouse dictate some limitations and open some new opportunities. Lets see how well will Kindle Fire fare when browsing the Web.

Any Internet browsing is going to be only as good as the Internet connection that is available. Kindle Fire uses 802.11b/g/n WiFi to connect to the Internet. In theory 802.11n networks can support speeds up to 600Mbps in ideal conditions. However most practical implementations have a much more modest limit of 150Mbs. This is still more than enough to stream blu-ray quality HD video in real-time. However conditions are rarely ideal. Also having a fast WiFi chip and good wireless router (even with excellent ISP down the line) may not be enough. In order to achieve fast network speeds device must have the processing power to move and consume the data.

Fortunately being a modern Android device, Kindle Fire supports Adobe Flash so I was able to use speedtest.net to measure ping, upload and download speed. It measured ping at 58ms, download at 3.56 megabit per second and upload at 2.76. When doing the same measurement from my desktop that is connected to the router via 1 gigabit wire results were: ping 14ms, 29.15Mbps download and 5.06Mbps upload (which is exactly what I pay Comcast for). So running data though the air rather than wire definitely slows things down. To find out how much is to blame on my router and neighbors RC toys and how much on Kindle Fire I ran a couple more tests from my Samsung Windows 8 tablet and iPad 2. Both produced upload and download speeds of around 5Mbps and ping or around 15ms. It is clear that while my wireless network has it’s limitations, Kindle Fire didn’t utilize it fully. It mostly suffered in the ping department. What this means in reality is that all things being equal you will see content on Kindle Fire 0.04 seconds later than you would on another device. In reality Kindle Fire provides speed and latency that is well enough to browse the web and even stream HD video at 720p.

While downloading content fast is nice it would be useless unless one could display the content properly. In modern web there are several standards that matter in terms of interactive content: HTML, HTML5 and Flash.

When originally released, Kindle Fire ran Linux version of Adobe Flash 10.3.186.50. It rendered most flash content without any problems and it rendered it fast. Not bad for a mobile device.

In terms of HTML standard compliance Kindle Fire web-browser scored 95/100 on Acid3 test. Not bad, but desktop versions of Internet Explorer 10 and latest version of Google Chrome can do 100/100. Out of sheer curiosity I ran Acid3 test on Kindle Touch and Kindle Keyboard. Both scored perfect 100/100.

Another important browser benchmark is Javascript performance. One of the standard ways to measure it is WebKit SunSpider test. It takes Kindle Fire 2,635 milliseconds to run one iteration. This is not bad for a mobile device at all. To put this into perspective, it takes 1st generation iPad 2,932 milliseconds to run the same test, while iPad 2 scores 1816ms. Windows PC based on Intel Core i5 CPU on the other hand runs it in 343 milliseconds. It took some time to finish by 1st generation NOOKcolor also managed to get though the test, scoring 13,624 milliseconds. While it is not fair to compare last year’s device to a modern one, it’s the best I can do at the moment.

Next lets take a look at HTML5 compliance. To test it I navigated Kindle Fire browser to html5test.com. it scored 196/450.  Not bad, but not too good either. Nook Color scored 181/450. IE10 scored 300/450 and latest version of Google Chrome scored 343/450. If you are interested in the gory details of what is supported and what is not – see this separate post.

While not perfect, in practice these results aren’t discouraging. HTML5 is still an emerging standard and most of websites are built on older technologies. Webmasters want their sites to be compatible with as many browsers as possible and cut down on shiny features in favor of compatibility.

All of the browsing except secure HTTPS websites goes though Amazon Silk proxy server. It serves several purposes. First it makes web-surfing more secure in public spots since all communications between Kindle Fire and Amazon Silk servers are encrypted. If you are using unsecure open hotspot like one in Starbucks, nobody would be able to eavesdrop on your web-browsing. HTTPS communications are not only encrypted but also guarantee that the server your browser connects to is indeed the one you see in the address bar and there are no middle-men, so Amazon Silk is disabled. This can be easily verified by visiting http://whatismyip.com/ and https://whatismyip.com/. Former would report “Possible Proxy Detected: HTTP/1.1 silk”

What is it that Amazon Silk does to speed up browsing exactly? In essence it does several things:

1. Acts as a smart proxy and central point of contact for the browser. So rather than having to connect to a dozen of separate servers to collect all images, scripts, videos etc found on the page, Kindle Fire browser only has to connect to Silk server which is faster.
2. Silk server may already have all or some of the resources needed to show the page so it can start sending them right away along with the page itself
3. Statistically Silk knows which web-pages people visit, it Silk would pre-load your next most likely destination into the browser (top headline on a news website)
4. Some of the page elements may be processed on Amazon EC2 (Elastic Computing) servers which are more powerful than Kindle Fire (see Javascript performance analysis above). How exactly this works is a bit of a mystery for me right now. I hoped to get a peek into it by sniffing network traffic between Kindle Fire and Amazon Silk, but the fact that this traffic is encrypted made it impossible

At the end of the day it is supposed to make your browsing faster, so that you could see web-pages you are interested in sooner. In reality it doesn’t help as much as one could hope for several reasons:

1. Bad WiFi connection is still a bad WiFi connection, no matter what. Things will be slow.
2. Websites that require you to log in (like Facebook) will not benefit from this technology at all because Amazon can’t cache anything because it is encrypted and specific to your account.

At the end of the day, Silk or no Silk, Kindle Fire still has a good functional web-browser that handles day-to-day tasks good enough. Here’s what I tried to do

Kindle Fire Browser (trying to do things)

• Open blogkindle.com :) – success – works flawlessly. Website renders as good as it does on a desktop.
• Try to type up a short post for blogkindle.com – partial failure – post editor works only partially in Kindle Fire Browser. It is possible to type raw HTML, but visual WordPress editor doesn’t work. In case you are wondering – it doesn’t work on iPad either.
• Log into facebook.com, read other people’s posts, post a status update – success.
• Log into twitter.com, read tweets and post one of my own – success.
• Browse CNN.com – success
• Open Gmail.com – success – both mobile and desktop versions work without problems on Kindle Fire. Of course there is also email app for that.
• Play a Flash game on addictinggames.com – more fail than success – the game runs, but it is too choppy and slow to enjoy.
• Browse amazon.com – success. It would be very surprising if it were otherwise.
• Watch a youtube.com video – success

Conclusion: Kindle Fire has more than adequate web-browser. Compared to browsing on iPad I saw no difference (including benefit from Amazon Silk).

You can cutomizer your browser, by tapping on the menu button and selecting “Settings”. Some interesting things that you can do there are:

• Disable Amazon Silk by checking “Accelerate page loading” off
• Enable or disable pop-up blocker
• Configure whether browser would remember passwords and form data
• Clear cookies for individual websites – “Website Settings” at the very bottom of settings menu.
• And if you are afraid you screwed something up you can “Reset to default”

Reading periodicals (Newsstand)

Kindle Fire gives you instant access to dozens of newspapers and magazines. You can either subscribe and have then automatically delivered to your device by the virtue of wireless Internet or just buy specific issues you are interested in. Many magazines feature 90-day free trial subscriptions. All purchases are stored in Amazon Cloud so you can always re-download newspapers and magazines that you purchased or subscribed to before to any Kindle Fire device that is registered to your account. The experience is pretty much identical Kindle eBooks and surely is convenient. There are two ways newspapers and magazines can work on Kindle Fire.

First one is very similar to eInk Kindle experience in terms of text layout, ability to customize text by selecting from one of the 8 font sizes, 3 line spacing settings, 3 margin sizes, color modes (white-on-black, black-on-white, gray-on-yellowish sepia) and these typefaces: Georgia, Caecilia, Trebuchet, Verdana, Arial, Times New Roman, Courier and Lucida. Of course, photos are in color and page turns animations are nice in smooth, but in essence reading a newspaper on Kindle Fire is the same structured experience it is on eInk Kindle – you see a list of sections and articles, you chose one and read it start to end.

Alternatively a magazine can be available was a set of high-resolution images that you can flip through much like a regular paper copy. You can pinch to zoom in and zoom out and flip though thumbnails. There is no way to customize text appearance in this case. While full page images are nice to look at, it is easier and comfortable to read articles the other way. Also, despite the fact that Kindle Fire is powered by dual-core 1Ghz CPU, zooming and flipping these large color images can be choppy.

Some of the subscriptions that you already have on eInk Kindle might be available for Kindle Fire (ex: Forbes Magazine), others (like Wall Street Journal) might not be. Alternatively is it possible that a magazine is only available on Kindle Fire and not on eInk devices (ex: “O, The Oprah Magazine”). I can understand why some content may be limited to color screen devices for quality purposes. But limiting something like WSJ to only eInk can be explained only by legal/copyright reasons.

Reading Books

Some were expecting Kindle Fire book reading experience to be simply Kindle App for Android pre-loaded on the device. Others expected text-to-speech being available. Neither turned out to be true. Kindle Fire reading app provides everything that one might expect from good eReader app. The app is an integral part of the home screen, available as “Books” tab. Within the tab usual “Cloud”, “Device” and “Store sections are present, making it easy to access and organize your eBooks.

• Text customization (same as for newspapers and magazines): line spacings, margins, night/day/sepia modes and 8 typefaces to choose from
• You can bookmark (invoke menu by tapping the center of the screen) and click on bookmark image
• Highlights and annotations are supported and they will synchronize across all your Kindle devices. You can’t however share those via Facebook and Twitter as with eInk devices.
• You can search within the text of currently open book or within book names but not withing the text of all books downloaded to the device (as with Kindle Keyboard, Kindle Touch or Kindle Non-Touch). Unlike eInk devices, Kindle Fire doesn’t create an index that allows to search for a word instantly. Instead the reader app will go through the book each time you do a search. The process is relatively fast.  It takes Kindle Fire 44 seconds to go through entire “Lord of the Rings” trilogy when looking for a word.
• New Oxford English dictionary is available for doing quick look ups of words within a book. Wikipedia and Google can also be used. Unfortunately there is no way to replace the default dictionary with another one (perhaps one that can be used for translation)
• You can maximize embedded images to full screen and zoom further in by using pinch zoom.
• Text-to-speech or any other form of accessibility is not supported

Most recently read books are added to the home screen carousel for fast and easy access.

By default Kindle App also handles PDF files. Whlie the files are readable, there isn’t a whole lot that you can do with them – not even search. Just flip pages and pinch zoom. Fortunately, 3rd party apps can be installed from the App Store (including Adobe Reader). If you root your device and enable Google Andoid Marketplace, your selection of PDF readers would be even greater.

This gets us to an interesting topic also related to reading books. Once you enable Google Android Market, you can install Android apps from other eBook stores and make broad eBook selection already available to you from Amazon even broader. More out of curiosity’s sake rather than for any practical benefit I went though the exercise of rooting my Kindle Fire, enabling Android market and installing following eReader apps:

• Barnes & Noble NOOK
• Google Reader
• Kobo Reader
• Sony Reader

Listening to Music

Kindle Fire comes equipped with stereo speakers, 3.5mm headphones jack and built in access to Amazon MP3 store. I’ve been using this store long before Amazon Cloud Drive/Player came about because Amazon sells their music DRM-free. Once you buy the track you can do whatever you want – play it on any number or iPods (or any other MP3 players), computers, smartphones, burn it to CDs etc. There are no restrictions at all. With introduction of Cloud Drive/Player, all your MP3 purchases are automatically copied to your Cloud Drive and will be stored there forever for free. It is easy for Amazon to do it since they already have the files on their servers. All they need to do is remember that you purchased the tracks and give you access to them when you need it.

Kindle Fire integration of Amazon Cloud makes it even more convenient. You can either stream your music right from the Cloud without bothering to download or you can download the music to device local storage in case you are going to listen it somewhere where WiFi networks are not available.

New to Amazon MP3 store but already have large collection of DRM-free MP3 files from elsewhere? No problem – you can upload your collection to the Cloud Drive and it will be as accessible as tracks that you’ve purchased from Amazon. Depending on the size of your collection, you may need to pay a small amount to Amazon yearly for storing your files.

You can browse your collection by artist, album or song and search within it. You can further organize it by creating playlists. Playlists are stored in the Cloud as well, so they will automatically synchronize across all your devices. You can access them thought the browser of your computer as well.

Built-in MP3 player is great, but it is not the only way you can listen to music on your Kindle Fire. There are also apps like Pandora, TuneIn Radio, Last.fm. All these are available though Amazon AppStore for Android – there is no need to root the device to get these applications.

The only shortcoming of Kindle Fire when it comes to listening to music is in the hardware department – Kindle Fire doesn’t have a Bluetooth radio. Making it impossible to use Bluetooth wireless headsets. These headsets normally come equipped with Play/Pause, Prev/Next track and volume control buttons offsetting the inconvenience of these buttons being absent on the device itself.

Listening to audiobooks

You can install audible app and download audiobooks straight to your Kindle Fire device without the need to connect the device to computer. Works perfectly. My only wish here is for Audible (actually owned by Amazon) to implement a system similar to Whispersync that would synchronize listening position in audiobook across all my devices.

Watching Videos

Another common use of tablet computers is watching movies and TV shows. Amazon has been in this market for quite some time with their Amazon Unbox offering. While video offerings from Amazon aren’t as generous as their MP3 “no-DRM, play anytime, anywhere as much as you want” they are still pretty good. There are several ways that you can get videos:

• If you have Amazon Prime (and if you just purchased Kindle Fire, you do for at least a month from the day of your purchase), you can access 10,000+ video titles for free anytime you want from your Kindle Fire
• You can rent movies and TV shows for a fixed price and watch them within 48 hours. So far I’ve seen most videos prices at $2.99 per rental.
• Some movies are available for “buy to own” type purchase. This means that once you pay, you can stream the title on any device (or through the browser). Purchased movies can also be downloaded to the Kindle Fire device to be watched even when the device is offline.
• You can copy your own video files to Kindle Fire and play then on the device

For videos streamed from Amazon, Whispersync keeps track of last watched location and synchronizes it across devices – much like last read page in Kindle eBooks. This way you can resume watching video at the same spot where you left off.

Videos that you manually copy via USB cable will not show up in the video tab of the home screen which is a pity. There are several ways that they can be accessed however. You can browse them in the Gallery app that comes with the device and lets you browse your photos as well. Or you can install a file browser like “ES File Explorer” and use it to browse and open your videos.

Once again, hardware is the area where Kindle Fire falls short of being perfect. Had it been equipped with HDMI output, it would have been possible to view all this video content on a larger screen. While nice to have this is not a huge deal since the same content can be streamed via PC or a host of other devices that can connect to Amazon (ex: my Samsung TV can do it via free downloadable app)

One thing worth noting is that Amazon Video streaming and download will not work while device is rooted. You can however root the device, do what you need to do, unroot it and get video streaming back. While device is rooted, video related buttons are disabled and there is a link underneath them that displays a message: “”Your device is no longer configured correctly to play Amazon videos. For more information see Help & Feedback under Settings.” followed by instructions that eventually lead you to customer support phone call. In my case CS rep didn’t know what was going on and forwarded my ticket to Tier-2 support. Meanwhile I’ve figured out the problem myself by unrooting the device.

Once again, there are other ways to get videos on your Kindle Fire besides Amazon. These ways come in the form of apps that you can get form the Amazon app store like Hulu Plus and Netflix.

Using Documents

Kindle comes with basic QuickOffice pre-installed. Basic version will let you only view documents. While full version will allow editing them as well. Additional apps expand documents handling functionality of Kindle Fire even further. Enabling Google Android store would take it even further.

Realistically though, tablets are meant fro content consumption – not creation or manipulation. This stems from the hardware limitations dictated portability and long battery life requirement. Even something as simple as preparing a blog post by half typing it out of your head and half copy-pasting data from other sources is nearly impossible to accomplish even on iPad, even with keyboard dock attached. Never mind 7″ tablet with no keyboard.

Document tab on the start screen is dedicated only to documents in one of the formats that are natively supported by Kindle Readers (PRC, MOBI, etc) or converted to these formats via Amazon online conversion tool. Conversion is accomplished by attaching a document to email sent to your special @kindle.com email address that is conveniently displayed on the “Docs”  tab of Kindle Fire or on the “Manage Your Kindle” page on Amazon.com

Kindle Fire Apps

Kindle Fire runs Gingerbread version of Android operating system that was heavily modified by Amazon. Although Amazon has their own Android app store with proprietary signing and certification standards, the code in the apps that run on Kindle Fire is still code written for Android. Many app developers have taken their existing Android apps and just certified then with Amazon to make them available on Kindle Fire. There are currently more than 20,000 apps available in the Amazon app store. This is just a tiny portion of apps that are available in general Google Android store but a lot of useful apps are already there and the number keeps increasing.

You can side-load apk packages from sources other than Amazon app store by enabling “Allow Installation of Applications from Unknown Sources” in the “Device” section of settings. You can download apk files from Kindle Fire browser and run then from there – no need to connect to the computer at all.

Obtaining apk files may be hard or impossible (in case of paid apps). You can still get access to all of the applications available in Google Android store by temporarily rooting your device and installing the Marketplace app.

When it is done you will be able to see updates that are already available in the general store by didn’t yet make it though Amazon certification process. If the app was originally installed from Amazon store, updates from Google store will fail to install because of different signing certificate. You should also keep in mind that buying app in one store doesn’t give you access to the same app in another. You can however install Amazon store on any android device since it is just an app freely available though Google App Marketplace. As I mentioned before it is possible to install Google marketplace on Kindle Fire as well, without losing any benefits.

Instructions for rooting and enabling Google Marketplace are available on several blogs but not all of them work. I’ll make instructions that I verified to work available here on this blog a bit later.

Another marketplace that Kindle Fire comes preloaded with is Amazon app for purchasing tangible good from Amazon – good for Amazon.

Email app is preloaded on Kindle Fire. Calendar is not, but it can be downloaded from the app store.

Kindle Fire Software

Kindle Fire Home screen is simple, yet efficient. It will probably fail to satisfy people who are used to something like GO Launcher EX heavily customized with additional widgets. But for most practical purposes it gets the job done.

Each tab except “Docs” and “Web” has 3 uniform sections: “Cloud”, “Device” and “Store”, making it easy to manage content on the device regardless of it’s type. Each section supports searching of content items by name. This is similar to how books used to be arranged on Kindle eInk devices prior to introduction of collections – you can tons of items piled up in archived items or home screen, but you can find the one you need quickly by searching for the right word. Often you don’t need to search at all because the content you need is at the top of the screen because you accessed it recently.

With Kindle Fire most recently viewed items regardless of type (book, video, music or app) are shown in the carousel on the home screen. You can also pin favorite items to the favorites shelf below the carousel so that these items are readily available regardless of when was the last time you used them.

Carousel animations are nice and smooth. Standard Android buttons (Home, Back, Menu and Search) appear at the bottom portion of the screen when they are needed. Notifications can be viewed by swiping the finger down from the upper-left part of the screen. Swiping from upper-right brings down tool bar for quickly controlling things like WiFi, sound volume, screen brightness and sync. It also acts as access point to device settings.

All-in-all, in quite happy with Kindle Fire software. Amazon did a good job cooking raw Android so that it can be safely digested by general public.

Kindle Fire Hardware

Although overall I consider Kindle Fire a device with great value for a modest price and it would be unrealistic to expect too much from device that sells for $199 I’m still going to list things that I found lacking in the hardware so that prospective buyers would be aware of them:

• Lack of hardware buttons besides power button. It is a problem since standard android buttons that apps rely on just being there are not always visible. It may take extra gestures to bring them out. When the app hangs it maybe impossible to bring them out altogether until the OS realizes that the app is not responding. During this time, volume control is not available either.
• Having something as simple as a mic (that isn’t that expensive really) would enable running Skype on Kindle Fire and would have unlocked a very useful scenario, making the device even more competitive. Going one step further and adding a webcam would have been even greater boon.
• Having Bluetooth connectivity would have made the device much more competitive as audio player. Kindle Fire could sit in your purse or backpack, while you would listen to music via wireless headset and use buttons on the headset to control the playback. Being able to use the headset would offset the disadvantage of missing the built in mic.
• Having HDMI connectivity would have been nice as well.

Other than that Kindle Fire is solid in terms of hardware, sporting a dual core CPU and very nice IPS display.

Conclusion

Kindle Fire is a very competitive device that comes connected to tons for different content from Amazon (and other companies via apps):

• Books,
• Music,
• Video,
• Apps,
• The Web

It has been built around the idea of making this content easily available to customers. The same idea that propelled Kindle eBook reader to success and made it a market leader. For $199.00, Kindle Fire is definitely the biggest bang for the buck in terms of things that it enables you to do. Surely there is always room for improvement, but isn’t it always the case?

Kindle Fire has enjoyed a positive reception from both critics and users. Reviews on the Web are mostly positive. Less than 48 hours from being made available it has already accumulated 761 review on Amazon and counting. Out of these, 395 are 5-star reviews.

PS: I took several picture an screenshots during this review – will add them a bit later.

Related Posts

• November 22, 2011 -- Kindle Fire vs Kindle Touch Hands-On: Is The Dedicated eReader Obsolete? (1)

Kindle Touch Weight

In case you are in a hurry or are not interested in the in-depth technical stuff you can just read though this brief review to get a high level scoop on recently released Kindle Touch.

• Noticeably smaller than Kindle Keyboard (KK/K3) and 0.5oz lighter. Just a notch larger (hardly noticeable) than Kindle 4 Non-Touch (K4NT) and 1.7oz heaver.
• Exactly same eInk Pearl screen as in Kindle Keyboard and Kindle Non-Touch (verified with colorimeter). Unlike backlit screens of tablets, eInk reads like a paper, so it is very readable in direct sunlight. On the other hand you will need a light to read from Kindle when it is dark. Some options include leather cases with built in lights and clip-on lights. Touch works based on infrared sensors so nothing is overlayed on top of the screen preserving its contrast.
• Only two buttons: Power and “Home”. Everything else is controlled by multi-touch and gestures (including page turns)
• No computer required – books and audio books are downloaded directly to the device. However you can still connect Kindle Touch to computer to transfer books via USB cable in case you can’t or don’t want to use 3G or WiFi
• Long battery life of up to 2 months on a single charge.
• WiFi only or 3G + WiFi connectivity available. However web-browsing of websites other than Wikipedia and Shelfari (Amazon’s free encyclopedia) only works though WiFi
• Text-to-speech can read your eBooks and (!!!) PDF documents to you via built-in speakers or headphones.
• Whispersync will automatically synchronize reading position between all your Kindle devices and apps so you can seamlessly read one book on many devices.
• Audiobooks from audible are downloadable directly from the Web and playable on Kindle. No computer required.
• Kindle Touch has a built-in MP3 player that can play music while you are reading books. Actually it can just play – you don’t have to read a book, unless you want to
• Built-in dictionary to look up definitions and translations of words in books and documents. You can also look up things in Wikipedia.
• Unicode support allows reading books in many languages, including Russian, Japanese, Chinese, Korean.
• X-ray feature allows you navigate characters and high-level concepts in a book
• Native support for PDF, MOBI, PRC, TXT and HTML. Other document types can be loaded onto Kindle via Amazon online conversion.
• Compared to previous Kindle versions PDF support has been improved.
• More than 1,000,000 in-copyright books available for purchase. Wast majority of these for $9.99 or less (including most of New York Times bestsellers). On top of these there are also around 2 million out of copyright books available for free.
• First chapters in any book are available to read as free samples.
• You can check out books from your local community library. For Amazon Prime subscribers it is also possible to loan books from Amazon library for unlimited time.
• Newspapers, magazines and blog subscriptions are automatically wirelessly delivered to Kindle Touch.
• 4 gigabytes of built-in flash memory can store up to 3,500 books at the same time.
• All eBooks that you buy from Amazon can be downloaded as many times as you like to your Kindle, PC, iOS, Android, Windows Phone 7 and other reading apps.
• Social features include Twitter and Facebook integration along with the ability to share book highlights and see passages that other people most frequently highlight in a book that you are reading.
• WebKit-based browser that can easily open complex web-applications such as GMail.
• 4 models to chose from:
• 3G + WiFi Kindle Touch – $189.00
• 3G + WiFi Kindle Touch with Special Offers – $149.00
• WiFi-Only Kindle Touch – $139.00
• WiFi-Only Kindle Touch with Special Offers – $99
• For pricing of other Kindle devices (keyboard and non-touch) see table in the left sidebar

Now lets take a deeper look at all o the aspects and features of Kindle Touch and how it compares to two other 6″ eInk devices – Kindle Keyboard (KK) and Kindle Non-Touch (KNT). I will refer and compare Kindle Touch (KT) a lot to these devices in the course of this review.

Kindle Touch Ergonomics

It is amazing how quickly we can become spoiled, especially when comparing things. Kindle 3 felt significantly lighter when compared to Kindle 2. Kindle 4 Non-touch felt like a feather compared to Kindle 3. As I hold all 3 current devices (Keyboard, Non-touch and Touch) and compare, I can clearly feel the difference in weight. Kindle Fire that also lays in front of me feels like a brick when compared to eInk devices. Yet the truth is that all 6″ eInk devices (and perhaps even 9.7 Kindle DX) are light enough not to bother you during prolonged reading. It takes reading for more than an hour on something as heavy as original iPad for my hand to go numb. According to Amazon Kindle Touch weights 7.8 with 3G modem and 7.5 without. My electronic scale actually put 3G version at 7.6oz. It seems like Amazon is systematically overstates weight of their devices starting from Kindle 3. To put this into perspective, Kindle Non-Touch weighs 5.9oz, and Kindle Keyboard – 8.5oz. Of course Sony PRS-350 is smaller and lighter still at 5.3oz but at a price of having a smaller screen.

Kindle Touch is just a notch larger (6.8″ x 4.7″ x x 0.40″) than it’s non-touch counterpart (6.5″ x 4.5″ x 0.34″) and smaller than Kindle Keyboard (7.5″ x 4.8″ x 0.34″). Weight and size difference can most likely be attributed to increased battery capacity.

As far as controls are concerned, 3 eInk Kindles have different control paradigms each of which has its pros and cons. Lets look at most typical eReader usage scenarios:

As you can see, the most frequent operation of flipping a book page is equally comfortable on all devices. In other operations, touch and keyboard perform on par with each other. So it’s really a question of what you will do more often. If English is a second language for you and you will frequent the dictionary than touch will have an advantage. If you annotate with text a lot, then keyboard rules the day. Non-touch device will give you some minor trouble even in such basic operations like finding a book by name (among 100s of other books in your archived items) but it pays back for this inconvenience in reduced size and weight.

As with Sony devices that pioneered eInk + touchscreen combo, there is a noticeable lag between finger manipulations and things happening on the screen. At first it seemed a little annoying to me but very soon I got used to it and stopped noticing it altogether. The convenience of selecting any word on the page by merely pointing at it is worth it.

Kindle Touch Screen

The screen in new Kindle Touch is the same eInk Pearl that Amazon has been using since Kindle 3. It is also currently used by Sony and Barnes & Noble in their PRS and Nook devices. It features resolution of 600 x 800 pixels and can display 16 shades of gray. It has higher contrast compared to older generations of eInk and quicker refresh time.

Kindle 3, 4 and Touch Screen comparison

Although some people on forums claim that screens look different, I tend to disagree. I’ve measured all 3 screens with colorimeter that is normally used for printer calibration and found the measurements to be close enough. Small discrepancies can be attributed to normal screen quality variance, different screen age and wear and minor measurement errors. The difference is so small that it wouldn’t be noticeable to a naked eye. This graph shows measurements of the L component of Lab color for 16 shades of gray, with “0″ being total black and “15″ being “total white”. “L” component is indicative of the brightness and disregards color information. “a” and “b” components were close to zero indicating almost neutral gray color with a slight greenish tint.

Touch interface is implemented by infrared sensors located on the edges of the screen. This way nothing is overlayed on top of eInk avoiding low-contrast disaster that resistive tochscreen film caused in Sony PRS-600. IR touchscreen attributes to a slightly thicker bezel around the screen. I’m guessing that to conserve battery power, IR transmitters light up only few times a second until user touch is detected and then sampling frequency is increased. This can explain why there is a lag that is longer that can be attributed to eInk refresh speed and why very quick taps on the screen can be ignored by the device altogether (though not always).

Although if you rotate your Kindle around you can find an angle at which fingerprints will be clearly visible, they are not during normal reading. So this is not a problem (for me at least)

All-in-all eInk + Touch combo is not perfect but it does provide added convenience over keyboard and even more so over the lack of keyboard in non-touch version.

Kindle Touch Battery

Given my past experience with Kindle 4 dis-assembly (and how it turned out to be irreversible) I’m going to put off taking Kindle Touch apart to see what is inside, including the battery. Based on the device weight and claimed battery life, I’m guessing that it would have the same capacity as in Kindle Keyboard or more to accommodate for infrared touch screen power use. However I suspect that it might be of the same soft-case, glued-in non-replaceable kind as in Kindle 4 Non-Touch. My second Kindle Touch is scheduled to arrive on November 22nd and then we’ll know.

Kindle Touch Fonts

Just as in Kindle 3, Kindle Touch features unicode font support enabling users to read texts in non-latin languages such as Russian, Japanese, Chinese, Korean, etc. No hacks are required. I did some quick tests and confirmed that Russian and Japanese Hiragana definitely work. If the language you need is not supported you can always bypass this limitation by saving the document as PDF that has all of the fonts embedded.

When reading books, Kindle Touch allows you to configure the font. You can select from:

• 3 typefaces: regular, condensed and sans-serif
• 8 font sizes that can be configured wither via fonts dialog or just by doing an pinch-zoom
• 3 settings or line spacing
• 3 settings of line width (called “words per line”)

Kindle Touch Software

According to “Device Info” section in “Settings” my Kindle Touch currently runs software version 5.0.0 (1370280073). Kindle Keyboard currently has software version 3.3, and Kindle Non-Touch has 4.0.1. While there is little in terms of visible differences between 3.x and 4.x branches of Kindle firmware, unsurprisingly version 5.x looks like a major overhaul since it had to accommodate a whole new paradigm of touch interface. But changes in the software go beyond just touch. Some existing features were changed and several new ones were added. Here’s  a scoop of what I’ve found so far:

• Table of Contents (both structural and in-text) now works in PDF
• Text-to-speech now works in PDF too.
• X-ray book rich information system. Lets you browse characters and high-level concepts found in the book. At the moment this feature is enabled for only a small fraction of Kindle eBooks
• Only portrait orientation is currently available for reading book or viewing PDF files. There are claims on message boards that landscape may be enabled via future software update
• MP3 player got a face-lift. In Kindle 2 and Kindle 3 you could only use hot-keys to start or pause it and advance to the next track. There was no way to go back. In Kindle Touch MP3 player controls are visible in book menu. You can play/pause, go back and forth between music tracks and control volume all with touch. Unfortunately there is still no artist/album navigation
• Audiobook player takes advantage of touch so you can easily jump to any location within the book
• Settings page was reworked and made more organized
• You can configure Kindle to do a full page refresh after each page turn to eliminate ghosting. By default this happens after every 6 page turns.
• Web-browser can access websites other than Wikipedia and Shelfari only when you are connected to WiFi (not via 3G). On the other hand you can access AT&T hotspots in the US for free.

Kindle Touch PDF support

One of the areas that was reworked in Kindle Touch is PDF file support.

Kindle finally added support for internal and external PDF hyperlinks. So things that were clickable in Adobe Acrobat Reader on PC are now clickable on Kindle. PDF documents became much easier to navigate. Another welcome addition was added support for structured table of contents that Adobe Acrobat normally displayed as a “tree-structure” to the left of the document. Kindle displays it as a flat menu. Again it makes documents easier to navigate. In the past one had to rely on search or “go to page…” command.

These commands are still there and work well.

Text-to-speech now works in PDF documents too.

Unfortunately landscape viewing mode is no longer there which makes documents that were designed to A4 or US Letter paper size very hard or impossible to read without zooming. Pan and zoom is controlled by multi-touch as one would expect, but it is not as convenient as switching your 6″ Kindle into landscape mode and paging though the document. With Kindle Touch, once you zoom in, you loose the ability to flip pages (need to zoom all the way out first). Panningg is reasonably fast due to the fact that the viewer updates only half of the pixels on screen and even those in 2-color mode. Once you stop panning a full page refresh follows to eliminate ghosting and display the image in full quality.

Found in UR, Frank Herbert’s Dune (though not “Dune’s Messiah”).

Kindle Touch X-ray

This was one of the highly-advertised features during the Kindle Touch reveal back in September. It lets you browse though characters and concepts in the book and see where they are mentioned. The feature is based on shelfari Amazon community encyclopedia. Currently it is only available in a very limited selection of books. After randomly checking a few dozen of books in my Kindle library I found it working in Stephen King’s “UR” (that was written specifically for Kindle) and Frank Herbert’s “Dune”. What is interesting that it didn’t work in “Dune’s Messiah” which is a sequel. I found it funny that one of the entities in the “Dune” book was “New York Times” due to the fact that it was mentioned in the afterword. While technically this is correct, it is a bit misleading.

Kindle Touch X-Ray

…

…

…

Kindle Touch Apps

Kindle has supported apps for quite a while. With introduction of Kindle Non-Touch and Kindle Touch, application market has split. Since Kindle Keyboard has been around the longest, most if not all Kindle apps work on that device. On the other hand, most currently do not work on Keyboardless devices due to poor user experience or complete inability to control the app without keyboard shortcuts.

So each individual app may or may not run on every type of Kindle device. With time app developers will update their apps to support as broad range of devices as possible buy meanwhile you can enjoy playing Number Slide on Kindle Touch.

Other small Kindle Touch Features

• Magazine reading layout was reworked to be more touch friendly and efficient. Font page now features 4 main articles chosen from different section. Either of these can be selected with a single tap.
• Surprisingly Kindle Touch doesn’t take advantage of pinch zoom to view images within eBooks. You can maximize images for full-screen viewing but can’t zoom in to a specific part of the image
• When content is downloaded you can see completion percentage ticking in real-time. It can be helpful if you are downloading something like 20 hours unabridged version of Tom Clancy’s “Dead or Alive” audiobook.
• Although officially Amazon is mum on HTML support, it is present. If you save HTML with file extension TXT into the documents folder, Kindle will open it and basic markup, formatting and hyperlinks will work.

Conclusion

All-in-all, Kindle Touch is another solid eReading device from Amazon. Although previous incarnations of Kindle were already quite good at their main purpose, which is reading books and newspapers. That being said, touchscreen interface still does add some value even if to keep the device usable while making it smaller and lighter. As I was typing this review (more than 3000 words as it turned out), 23 user reviews were already posted on Amazon, more than half of them are 5-star reviews.

With purchase price of $99 (though I’d recommend making a one-time $50 investment to get lifetime free 3G) Kindle Touch provides great value (especially considering the ability to get books for free from library (either your local one or Amazon Prime). If you will find sponsored screensavers annoying, you can always pay $30 that you saved during the initial purchase to amazon to have them removed.

Related Posts

• January 23, 2012 -- Kindle Touch 5.0.3 Update Available for Manual Download (0)
• October 26, 2011 -- Amazon to Offer Trade in Option for Older Kindles. (0)
• September 28, 2011 -- Kindle Touch, Kindle Fire – New Amazon devices announced… (9)
• July 29, 2011 -- The Amazon Kindle’s International Future (3)

Since I do feel rather strongly that there are uses for this Kindle yet, and that many people would find it worth the money, let’s take a look at the factors that weigh your choices when looking into a new purchase.  Here are some of the more important specs that differentiate the Kindle DX against its newer siblings:

	Kindle 4	Kindle Touch	Kindle DX
Display	6″ E INK Pearl	6″ E INK Pearl Touchscreen	9.7″ E INK Pearl
Connectivity	WiFi	WiFi + Optional 3G	3G
Battery Life	1 Month	2 Months	3 Weeks
Weight	5.98 Ounces	7.5 – 7.8 Ounces	18.9 Ounces
Storage	2GB (1,400 Books)	4GB (3,000 Books)	4GB (3,500 Books)
Price	$79	$99 – $149	$379

Kindle 4

Pros:

This new Kindle is the least expensive and most portable ever to hit the shelves.  It weighs less than most paperback books, for example, and will technically fit in your pocket.  Please note that for the safety of your Kindle it is not recommended that you carry your Kindle around in a pocket. The battery life, while not quite as impressive as the more expensive Kindle Touch, is still an impressive month of reading.  You can even change the language of the Kindle interface now, should you have a non-English preference.

Cons:

The Kindle 4′s inability to be purchased with 3G connectivity makes it a potentially poor choice for people without access to a reliable wireless network.  Storage is also substantially reduced, which might be an issue for people with large libraries.  This may not matter to many, however, because this Kindle also lacks the ability to play audiobooks, or indeed any form of audio.  If you like to listen to music while you read or have plans to make use of the Kindle line’s popular Text to Speech feature, this is not the right device.

Kindle Touch

Pros:

The first ever Kindle with a touchscreen, the Kindle Touch eliminates the uncomfortable keyboard that many people have often complained was simply wasted space on their eReader.  This manages to reduce the weight, allows for an easily usable localized interface, and generally speeds up navigation.  This particular Kindle also has access to the X-Ray feature, which will allow readers to highlight connected passages throughout a given book, find term repetitions, locate external references, and pull up detailed articles via Wikipedia.  So far, no other member of the product line has access to that.  You will also get the device with the highest battery life in this comparison as well as the opportunity to choose 3G coverage in addition to the included WiFi capabilities.  Unlike the Kindle 4, this eReader has audio capabilities and will be able to both play audio files or audiobooks and read texts aloud for you using the Text to Speech feature.

Cons:

While Amazon has made the Kindle Touch’s interface quite simple to use while reading, it is still completely lacking in physical page turn buttons.  This will make a small difference in how you hold the device and how often the screen needs to be cleaned.  It is also slightly more expensive than the Kindle 4, though still coming in just under the $100 mark if you make use of the cheapest options.  Aside from that, the only real downside is the highly restricted nature of the optional 3G coverage.  Unlike previous Kindles, this one will only allow users to browse the Kindle Store and Wikipedia via 3G.  Everything else is blocked off, rendering that option far less appealing.

Kindle DX

Pros:

The clearest advantage here is going to be screen size.  Having a 9.7″ screen to work with will come in very handy for just about any book.  This is especially important for people who prefer or require larger print sizes, or for the display of standard size PDF files that might be difficult to view on smaller devices.  The Kindle DX has slightly more available storage space than either of the other options, which is also useful for PDF viewing as those files tend to be far larger than Amazon’s proprietary format.  Also, this is the only device listed here that allows unrestricted 3G connectivity.  Of all products in the Kindle line, the DX is probably the best suited for internet browsing.

Cons:

The biggest downside here is weight.  The Kindle DX is clearly far too heavy for comfortable long-term reading if you prefer to hold your book in one hand.  It is better compared to a hardcover book, which has a bit more heft.  Perhaps owing to the assumption that people would not want to be reading with just one hand anyway, there are no left-side navigation controls.  This can make the device hard to use, especially for lefties.  The firmware for the DX is also lagging a bit behind and shows no signs of pending improvements, so what you have now is probably all you’re going to get.  Finally, obviously, is the price.  At nearly four times the cost of the Kindle Touch, the DX will only be worthwhile if its larger screen provides you with something you find truly valuable.

Recommendations

Kindle 4: Perfect as a paperback replacement for the regular reader.  The stripped down model provides a cheap enjoyable reading experience.

Kindle Touch: Great for active readers.  By far the best option if you like to highlight, annotate, and examine your reading material closely.

Kindle DX: The larger screen makes this desirable for people preferring large print, anybody carrying around loads of PDF files, students, and those with a strong preference for the hardcover feel of a book.

Related Posts

• December 9, 2011 -- To Touch, or Not To Touch: Choosing Kindle 4 vs Kindle Touch (7)
• December 5, 2011 -- Special Offers Now Available For All Kindle eReaders (7)
• October 14, 2011 -- Kindle Fire vs Kindle eReaders: Interface Differences and Why They May Matter To You (1)
• October 13, 2011 -- Kindle Fire vs Kindle Touch: Deciding Which Meets Your Needs Better (0)

The first thing to do is figure out what you want from a Tablet PC.  To me, they are designed perfectly for passive computing.  That is, anything you choose to do that requires minimal user input, be that movie watching, reading, listening to music, or browsing the web.  I would not, for example, prefer to be writing this review on any tablet if I could help it.  It is nice to have the option to do things like play games or edit documents when necessary, but there are (and in my mind will likely always be) better-suited choices for those activities.  This assumption will color my perceptions here, and should you have other preferences my points might not make sense.

That said, I think that what Amazon is bringing to customers with the Kindle Fire is the cohesive media consumption experience.  Most passive computing tasks obviously revolve around media.  The Fire’s default UI  highlights magazines, books, music, and videos without preventing more interactive usage.  It is an all-in-one platform for shopping and usage tightly integrated with the Amazon store.  That said, everybody will be using their tablet differently so it might be helpful to break down the potential uses and how they stack up for the price.

Video

This is clearly where Amazon has been going with the Kindle Fire.  Not only has the Amazon Instant Video service been significantly beefed up recently with selections from big names like CBS and Fox, but the Prime Instant Video streaming options are being highlighted through the bundled Amazon Prime membership preview every tablet will come with.  While I am a big fan of the benefits of the Prime membership anyway, right now it doesn’t do much in terms of digital content distribution besides facilitate movie watching.

The Kindle Fire has a 7″ display with the same sort of wide viewing angle technology that the iPad makes use of.  It’s supposed to be fairly anti-reflective, though that’s something better inspected in person, and looks to provide a great picture.  Its local storage is sufficient for a few hours of video when you’re away from reliable internet connections, and the streaming through the service has proven reliable on other devices already.  While it is a small screen and it would be nice if they had included some form of HDMI output, the video experience should be excellent.

Audio

There’s not too much to say about the anticipated audio capabilities of the device.  It will have internal speakers and a headphone jack.  Music will be playable both from local storage and through the Amazon Cloud Player.  I think it is a safe assumption that the App Store will fill in gaps with things like Pandora and Last.fm, so selection and affordability probably won’t be too much of an issue, and Amazon regularly runs promotions for free songs along with larger purchases if you happen to do much shopping through the main site.

Reading

There are two sides to the question of reading that have to be talked about.  First is the standard reading experience such as we are used to with existing Kindles.  This will almost certainly be less enjoyable on the Kindle Fire due to its back-lit display, but since it uses the Kindle Cloud Reader the experience will be familiar and enjoyable aside from that.

In addition, we finally have real color reading capabilities.  This means the Kindle Fire is the Kindle of choice for all sorts of things from Kid Books to Magazines that wouldn’t work quite right on the monochrome Kindle.  Expect to see a big push with regard to these types of publications in the weeks leading up to the launch of the device.  Amazon has already got a number of deals going, including exclusive deals on a decent selection of magazines and comics.

Web Browsing

The big surprise at the press conference announcing the Kindle Fire was the Silk web browser.  It is essentially a modified Android browser that will offload most of the work to Amazon’s servers.  This has the potential to speed up browsing significantly and may even reduce load on the device itself, increasing battery life.  The biggest advance that it brings to browsing is a predictive analysis of browsing habits that Amazon claims will speed things up even more by preemptively caching the data you are most likely to need next.  We’ll see how it pans out, but it’s a great idea in theory.

Applications

Beyond making the observation that the Amazon Android App Store already has a great selection of apps to choose from, there’s not much point in talking about the app experience.  It’s just too large a topic to generalize on.  From what we have seen, though, the Kindle Fire will be bundled in with an email app and document reader app, both of which seem to be capable of doing the job as well as might be hoped for while maintaining the overall theme of the OS.  Hard to argue with that.

Overall, this is a $200 tablet that seems to offer more functionality than anything else available for less than $500.  It isn’t perfect.  There is no 3G option, the hard drive is small enough that people without reliable internet connections to take advantage of the cloud storage might want to think twice, and the fact that it is a first generation device might mean there are some bugs to iron out in the first months after release.  Even so, I’m of the opinion that the Kindle Fire offers great value for what it does and will make users very happy so long as they know what it can do and what they want out of it going into things.

Related Posts

• January 21, 2012 -- Kindle Fire January Re-Review (8)
• January 3, 2012 -- Kindle Fire a Huge Hit This Holiday Season (4)
• November 21, 2011 -- Kindle Fire Review (1)
• October 29, 2011 -- Kobo To Take On Kindle Fire With New “Vox” Tablet (0)

The basics are still in place, of course.  The display is the usual E INK Pearl screen technology that all current generation eReaders are pretty much required to have.  The battery life is just as good as the Kindle 3 (or the Kindle Keyboard as we’re now supposed to refer to it I suppose) and will give users weeks or months between charges even during periods of heavy use.  The connectivity includes built in WiFi and optional 3G coverage depending on which model you go with.  Storage will remain more than sufficient for carrying a library worth of reading material while also allowing you to offload extra books to the Amazon servers.  Whatever springs to mind when you think “Kindle” will probably be pretty accurate still.

There are obviously a few things that are new and unique to this Kindle family addition, though.  The obvious one is the touch screen.  It will be making use of the increasingly popular IR touch system also utilized by the competing Nook Simple Touch eReader.  This avoids the problems that Sony had with their early touchscreen eReaders, where the extra layer required for the touchscreen reduced readability on the device.  It also allows for the use of gloves, which many of you will be aware can be problematic on devices like the iPad unless you get specialty products to compensate.

Along with the new screen technology, Amazon has clearly sped up the refresh rate on the new Kindle.  It is “optimized with proprietary waveform and font technology”, which I am taking to mean that they have worked out a process to absolutely minimize the refreshed area of the screen during each page turn.  The extra speed is quite noticeable and again seems comparable to the Nook Simple Touch based on the currently available video footage.

The only other immediately obvious difference from the Kindle 3 is the physical presence of the device itself.  The Kindle Touch is smaller, lighter, silver, and lacks any form of mechanical button.  Everything is tied into the touchscreen, so there is no need for anything extraneous.  While the new Kindle 4 without a touchscreen manages to be even smaller and lighter, this is a noticeable improvement over the Kindle 3 and will likely improve long-term reading experiences somewhat.

At a glance, this new addition to the product line is a perfect response to the competition.  It is light, fast, attractive, and has a touchscreen display.  I will admit that I wish there were physical page turn buttons as a matter of personal preference, but that’s hardly a deal breaking factor.  Most of what makes it such an attractive deal, however, is how little they have had to change since the last Kindle.  It seems to basically be a new screen on an old device.

In terms of functional differences in the software, we’re left without much right now.  The EasyReach feature will partition off the screen in such a way as to make page turning more intuitive and less dependent on swiping than might otherwise be the case.  That’s a nice addition.

There is also “X-Ray”.  X-Ray is a feature that will allow users to quickly scan passages containing references to particular keywords while drawing upon information from Wikipedia and Shelfari.  It is hard to anticipate exactly how well this will work in practice, but Amazon has proven fairly adept at making use of predictive algorithms.  While I don’t believe they will be able to, as they claim, find “every important phrase in every book”, this could be a great reference tool.

Annotation may also be significantly improved by the addition of the new input.  Highlighting, placing the cursor, and generally navigating in small motions is problematic on the Kindle Keyboard’s 5-way controller.  It isn’t bad, but it’s too slow to be used as extensively as some may want.

I would claim that the new personal library browsing has been improved by the inclusion of a cover display shelf type of interface, but I don’t really consider this a useful feature.  While for some titles it is perfectly simple to pick out their cover from the crowd, many still have not been optimized for E INK’s monochrome displays.  Even more problematic is the importing of titles from other sources.  If the focus of the Kindle is really going to be the reading experience, highlighting the pretty pictures should not be a major sales point.

While this is only a minor hardware and firmware improvement over the last model and competing devices, it addresses demand and gives customers access to one of the cheapest, most useful eReaders available today.  Keep in mind that the Kindle platform brings huge value to the table as well with the inclusion of Whispersync, library lending(yes I know it’s new and late in coming, but it’s definitely the easiest to use at the moment now that it’s here), cloud storage, and perhaps the most impressive eBook store currently open.

So, is this a better eReader than its main competition in the US?  The Nook Simple Touch is the obvious point for general comparison.  Barnes & Noble took everything they learned from the original Nook, copied a few more things from the Kindle, and created a really fine eReader.  I would say that the playing field has tipped slightly in Amazon’s favor, though.  Not necessarily because of the superior physical properties of the device, but because the Kindle Touch brings equivalent hardware to the table and leaves the Kindle’s superior software and content to win out.  This isn’t to say that a major B&N update can’t change things, but for now they might have a problem with Amazon.

Related Posts

• December 9, 2011 -- To Touch, or Not To Touch: Choosing Kindle 4 vs Kindle Touch (7)
• December 5, 2011 -- Special Offers Now Available For All Kindle eReaders (7)
• October 14, 2011 -- Kindle Fire vs Kindle eReaders: Interface Differences and Why They May Matter To You (1)
• October 11, 2011 -- Kindle 4 vs Kindle DX: Where To Find The Most Value (5)

Although Amazon sticks to not adding numbers to their device names, software on the unit that I’ve received is 4.0 (1308590058). Serial number starts with B00E, leaving B00B, B00C and B00D unaccounted for at this moment. Surely some of the gaps in serial numbers are going to be filled in with Kindle Touch and/or Kindle Fire.

Kindle 4 Setup

Although Kindle 4 comes preconfigured with your Amazon.com account just like previous generation devices, it does ask you a few questions during the initial start-up:

• Language that you prefer to use. It can later be changed in Device settings. This is a new feature of Kindle software 4.0. You can choose from German, US or UK English, Spanish, French, Italian and Portuguese.
• Connect to WiFi network. This is essential for getting books and further working with the device since keyboardless Kindle 4 lacks 3G connectivity. Perhaps this feature will stay in Kindle Touch 3G as well. This will encourage more users to use their home WiFi networks to cut 3G costs for Amazon and provide better battery life and faster download times for users.
• Confirm amazon account to be used with the device. I guess that people often gifted Kindles but still had them initially bound to their own account. This might have created extra customer support calls for Amazon and they decided to address this issue as well. Of course you can always deregister and re-register your Kindle through settings just like before.

Kindle 4 Apps and Games

Ever since the keyboardless device was announced during the press conference in NYC I couldn’t help but wonder: “what will happen to Kindle apps?”. While some of them can get by with only 5-way controller, physical keyboard is essential for many. I wonder no more – applications are disabled in keyboardless Kindle 4. If I were to venture with a guess – they will also be disabled in Kindle Touch. Touchscreen is nice, but it would still be cumbersome to use in Kindle games and apps that rely on keyboard shortcuts. It looks like Kindle Fire games and apps are “going to be the way of the future”. Rather than letting customers have a sub-par experience, Amazon decided to cut the feature altogether. Although most apps don’t work on the new device, some do. Amazon has inspected apps and certified some as compatible with devices that don’t have a keyboard. For example you can get “Jewels” and “Grid Detective” on Kindle 4 and play these games. Amazon will work with app developers to make as many existing titles compatible with Kindle 4 as possible. The same will be true with Kindle Touch once it is released. It will have a separate certification program of its own.

What is new in Kindle 4?

In terms of software – not a whole lot… Here are the things that I’ve noticed so far:

• UI language selection. You can change Kindle UI language in the device settings. Doing so causes the device to restart. Please not that it only affects menu and UI language. Dictionary lookup will still be based on the dictionary that you currently have installed. By default this is English Oxford. If you would like to use translation dictionary (including translation from different languages) – take a look at selection of dictionaries that we offer.
• Menus were cleaned up a bit in PDF viewer. Irrelevant controls are completely hidden rather than shown as disabled.
• Power button is now pressable rather than slideable. Personally I like pressing more. Perhaps this is because sliding the button though zip-lock when reading in bath tub is a pain.

Kindle 4 vs Kindle 3

On the other hand, several features that were present in Kindle 3 are missing in Kindle 4:

• Hardware keyboard. This is the most noticeable change and it truly is a double-edged sword. On one hand I really appreciate reduced weight and size while retaining the same 6″ screen (while Sony PRS-350 is lighter still, it has smaller screen that may be harder to read if your eyesight is not perfect). On the other hand you never truly know what you had until you loose it. And loosing a keyboard is a major inconvenience. While most of the time you use Kindle for reading and the only button you care about is “Next page”, you do need to type text from time to time:
• To find already purchased book in your “archived items”.
• To find a new book in Amazon Kindle Store and purchase it. I’m pretty sure that Amazon will soon notice reduced book purchases from keyboardless devices. And this reduction can only be partially attributed to more frugal audience. Buying books without keyboard is less convenient. On the other hand, having WiFi and not needing a PC is still a whole lot more convenient than Sony way of buying books via PC.
• To do a quick google/wikipedia search if you don’t feel like getting up and using your other Internet connected devices
• To use apps. Especially productivity apps like Calendar and Notepad
• Kindle Apps are disabled. Only limited number of apps are supported at the moment.
• There is no audio at all. Not even a headphone jack. This eliminates “text-to-speech” “read-to-me” feature and “voice guide” accessibility. It is also not possible to listen to background MP3s while reading a book or listen to audiobooks. While small – this is still an inconvenience.
• There is no 3G version. Accessing WiFi on the go can be problematic sometimes and I would have gladly paid extra $50 for lifetime 3G and assurance that I’ll be able to get new books pretty much anywhere. According to my Kindle 4 disassembly, there is plenty of space inside to accomodate 3G modem and larger battery to feed it. So it seems that this choice was made either to cut costs or/and to make purchasing Kindle Touch more desirable.

Kindle  4 Ergonomics

Kindle 4 is one inch shorter and 1.5 ounces lighter than Kindle Keyboard. Personally I find lighter and smaller better. I don’t think that Kindle 4 is too small. While buttons are easily reachable in the center where they are, it would have been easier if they were shifted to the right. This would have made the device much less convenient for left-handed people of course. Page turning buttons are smaller than in K3. Initially I found Kindle 3 buttons uncomfortable. I’ve grown used to them since and not I don’t have a problem with either Kindle 4 or Kindle 3 buttons.

Kindle 4 Accessories

When buying Kindle 4 from Amazon you have the option of adding following items to your order:

• Power adapter. If you plan to travel a lot – do get it. It is much more convenient to charge from the AC outlet than keep you laptop running just to let your Kindle charge via USB. If you already have USB charger for your smartphone or similar device it will most likely work with Kindle. Or maybe you will want to be the cool kid on the block and go with solar USB charger…
• Leather cover (no light)
• Zip Sleeve to protect your Kindle from scratches.
• 2-year squaretrade extended warranty. $25 warranty on $79 device that already has one year of top-notch Amazon support (with polite customer reps and cross-shipping replacements) doesn’t seem like a good deal to me.

Accessories

Lighted cover power connectors have moved to the back and became more exposed. So don’t throw powered on Kindle in a bag with lots of metallic things – they might short out the battery. When Kindle is powered on there is 4 volt on these contacts next to the power button and USB.

Kindle 4 Connectors

Bottom line

If you are choosing between Kindle 4 and Kindle 3 – choose based on how important to you is reduced size vs lack of apps, audio, 3G and keyboard. If these features are not important to you – you should get Kindle 4 and enjoy it’s compact size. Otherwise get Kindle Keybaord (K3) for $20 more which is a great device to begin with.

Related Posts

• October 10, 2011 -- A Kindle 3 vs Kindle 4 Comparison (6)
• January 12, 2012 -- SolarFocus Kindle Cover Revealed (0)
• December 9, 2011 -- To Touch, or Not To Touch: Choosing Kindle 4 vs Kindle Touch (7)
• December 5, 2011 -- Special Offers Now Available For All Kindle eReaders (7)

Kindle Cloud Reader

Following the recent move by Apple to cripple any iBooks competition via billing requirements, it really isn’t much of a surprise to see Amazon pushing the Kindle Cloud Reader to what seems like it might be an early release.  What is surprising is how functional it is at launch and how familiar it will feel to many people.  Now users can read their Kindle eBooks on any device they happen to have a browser on, at least theoretically, with no need to even think about downloaded Apps.

Right now users can only access the Kindle Cloud Reader through either Apple’s Safari browser or Google Chrome, which is what leads me to believe that this is an early release.  The fact that users will be able to pull this up on iPads but not on Android based Tablets would not make much sense otherwise.  If you attempt to access the service through an alternative browser, you will see nothing but a splash screen for it with a bit of the basic information and links to currently supported choices.  Since Android users still have access to a fully functional Kindle for Android app, however, it makes sense to prioritize elsewhere.  The ads for the service have definitely been making a big deal about the integrated shopping experience for iPad users, which is what distinguishes it from the iOS app.  Without something to make it at least equal to the existing Android Kindle app, not many people should feel the lack.  Support for Firefox, Internet Explorer, the Blackberry Playbook browser, and more have been promised in the months to come.  Given how excellent this early version is already, it’s something to look forward to.

To get started, head to https://read.amazon.com in either of the supported browsers (if you do not have either Chrome or Safari, they are both freely available and linked at the end of this posting). When asked to log into the service, simply enter your usual Amazon.com store account.  Should you like to have your Kindle content available locally even when you are not connected to the internet, which I strongly recommend since it seems to speed things up a bit so far on my end, you will be given the option.  All of your Kindle Edition purchases will be immediately available in a familiar layout, either way.

The Library view is easy to use and will be quite familiar to anybody who has used the Kindle apps before.  You have a couple sorting and arrangement options in the upper-left corner and a size slider when you’re in grid view.  Assuming you decided to enable offline reading via downloaded texts, you should see a Cloud/Downloaded toggle at the top of the screen.  By default, you will not have all of your eBooks downloaded.

Any book that you want to save a local copy of will have to be acquired manually.  Simply find it in the Cloud view, right-click on the cover art, and select “Download and Pin Book”.  Each one takes perhaps ten to thirty seconds on an average internet connection.  According to the Amazon help page for this app, you can store 50MB locally on your iPad.  There are no posted restrictions for people using PC browsers.

When it comes to the actual reading experience, you have pretty much everything you can expect from an eReading application.  On the PC browsing is achieved using the mouse, arrow keys, PgUp/Down buttons, or space bar.  Nothing standard is left out, even if you can’t necessarily map your own keys yet.  There are five font sizes to choose from, adjustable margins that do a good job of accommodating most screen sizes and orientations, and three color schemes.  While there isn’t any finely tuned personalization included, the setup makes the best of the fact that you’ll be reading on an LCD while keeping everything as simple as possible.

The only really major shortcoming right now, aside from the already mentioned lack of universal browser compatibility, is the limited integration of extra features.  For example, there does not seem to be any real way to perform a text search, which rules it out as an app substitute right now for a number of uses.  Also, while you can sync all of your annotations and highlighting, you can’t make any new changes to any of it at this time.  All that really seems included right now is bookmarking and syncing of last pages read.  Given that the whole Whispernet setup makes up a core feature set of the Kindle experience it seems pretty likely that fixing these shortcomings will be happening in the very near future, but this is something to be aware of.

Overall, this is a great offering.  The idea is clearly to stick it to Apple for bringing things to the point of conflict with their App Store purchasing rules, and I would say that even if things never went beyond their present state it would still be enough to be attractive for the majority of iOS Kindle users.  There is literally nothing that Apple can reasonably do to block out Amazon’s control of the platform when it goes through something like this, and there doesn’t seem to be a lot that the browser based nature of the Kindle Cloud Reader would force the company to leave out.

As the application develops, it would not be surprising at all to learn that Amazon intended to replace their entire app presence with Cloud solutions.  The Amazon Cloud Drive and Cloud Player, both of which obviously precede the Kindle Cloud Reader, do a pretty good job of demonstrating the potential.  Perhaps after the success of those it was only a matter of time.  Stay tuned for any updates to the browser app as the feature set and browser compatibility are improved.  We’ll do our best here to keep you abreast of any changes and improvements.

Get Google Chrome Browser

Get Apple’s Safari Browser

In case you have missed it, here’s a post by Andrei with some speculations about where Kindle Cloud Reader came from and where it might be headed.

Related Posts

• October 10, 2011 -- Kindle Fire Review (Pre-release) (3)
• February 7, 2012 -- iPad 3 Release Date Rumors Flying, What will this mean for the Kindle Fire? (0)
• January 21, 2012 -- Kindle Fire January Re-Review (8)
• January 11, 2012 -- What the Future Means for E-Readers (1)

See, students will always have more to read in a given week than they will have any interest in carrying around.  Which makes something like a Kindle an advantage.  At the same time, in many disciplines the mediocre PDF display capabilities, small screen, and lack of color do have the ability to hinder the eReader’s usefulness.  Recently, however, we have the iPad and the Nook Color as more expensive but potentially more versatile additions to the student equipment list.  It made me curious: We can theorize all we want about what should or shouldn’t be the most useful in a professional or academic setting, but what do the people actually using the devices in these situations think?  So I asked.

I talked to 43 students who had all used their eReading device for at least three months.  I then went down the list and found the common complaints and praises to share with you all.  Here’s what we got:

Amazon Kindle

Pros:

• Battery that lasts forever
• Glare-free screen
• Storage aplenty
• Built-in Dictionary
• Wide selection of books, both academic & pleasurable

Cons:

• No color for diagrams
• No functioning microphone
• No way to easily take notes during class
• Awkward pagination
• Slow text searching
• Hard to read faculty-scanned articles

Barnes & Noble Nook Color

Pros:

• Color Screen
• Very Portable
• Easy to hack
• Runs Android
• Can play games and watch video after hacking

Cons:

• Poor Battery Life with WiFi turned on
• Can’t read outside
• Complicated to install things on
• Underpowered for full tablet use

Apple iPad

Pros:

• Runs everything
• Good screen
• Can take notes with proper keyboard
• Fast
• Lots of apps, no hacking needed

Cons:

• Heavy
• Feels breakable
• Expensive
• Disliked by some instructors
• Very easy to spend too much money through

Now, I’ll start out by saying here that not one person I talked to lately was unhappy with their current purchase.  A few of the Nook Color owners had iPad envy, but that was about it. I am also not trying to claim that any of the pros and cons listed for one device do not apply to one of the others.  These were just the things that those I talked to felt was important.  Everything listed was mentioned by at least five eReader owners.

Surprisingly, of the 12 Nook owners, 10 had rooted their eReaders to make them more functional and most of them said that they enjoyed the tablet functionality more than using them for reading.  iPad owners were very happy with their devices, but frequently had trouble with instructors who were wary of potential abuse of the tablets during classes(presumably the same instructors would be anti-laptop as well, of course).  Kindle owners were the most satisfied in general but tended to be students in the Humanities, while some of the color tablet owners, in business students, mentioned having been converted away from the Kindle in favor of something that better displayed charts and graphs.

I wouldn’t say we have any clear winners on this one.  It’s all a matter of what you want to do and how much you want to pay.  If you’re a student in the market for an eReader, you might want to look at some reviews and give these factors some consideration.

For any of you I happened to talk to for this, the responses were appreciated!

Related Posts

• September 3, 2011 -- Kindle Tablet Finally Sampled? (0)
• August 5, 2011 -- Despite Rumors, Kindle Tablet Unlikely To Target Only Nook Color Competition (0)
• July 20, 2011 -- First Quarter Analysis Puts Barnes & Noble Nook Line Ahead of Amazon Kindle (0)
• May 20, 2011 -- Considering a Possible Kindle Phone (0)

No Good Kindle Annotated Editions?

Alice, an English Grad Student, said:

I picked up my Kindle because I was getting ready for my Comps and figured it was an easy way to save some hassle on Inter-Library Loan stuff and maybe even a bit of money, in the long run.  As far as that use, I don’t have a thing to complain about.  Pretty much everything I needed was either free or cheap, and I found some cool stuff I didn’t expect to have along the way.  What makes me kinda regret the decision though is that there’s no real equivalent to something like a Norton Edition that I’ve been able to find.  Annotation and an applicable set of secondary sources can be an amazing help when you’re looking at something new, but now I find myself weighing that against the price difference in a way I never did before.  It can be a pain.  I hope they fix that soon.

Nook Color means Kindle Color Soon, right?

Melissa, a Sociology Undergraduate, said:

I got my Kindle DX from my mom at Christmas last year.  It’s been great for classes where teachers think they’re going to save us loads of money by putting all sorts of articles online.  I hate reading on computers, but nobody wants to print off a thousand pages.  What I’m looking forward to is the Kindle Color.  I figure, it’s only a matter of time now that the Nook got there first.  It’s not like Amazon would want to be the second-best book reader, would they?

Kindle Textbooks

A TN Professor who prefers to remain unnamed said:

Ok, I love the Kindle and all those others in theory, but they only give me some of what I need.  I want to convince my department that we need to get these kids buying their Kindles as freshmen so that it’s worth the money by the time they graduate even if not all of their books are available for it in most classes.  So far, no luck. When more Kindle textbooks start becoming available, I think I can see a change happening.  Until that happens, the school bookstore just integrated somehow with a Barnes & Noble ebook thing so I guess we’re going to have to go with them.

As I mentioned, the overwhelming majority of those I talked to really loved their Kindles.  Did some, like these, want more?  Well, really, who doesn’t?  One thing that I did notice, however, was that even for those we thought that the Kindle was only somewhat useful for school loved it for personal use.  Call that added value, maybe?  Anyway, I love the fact that there’s finally a growing segment of the population at colleges who are pushing for the use of eReading devices.  Did we really need a new edition of that 30lb, $140 biology textbook every single year?

Related Posts

• December 10, 2011 -- Kindle Fire Review Roundup (0)
• September 18, 2010 -- Kindle 3 Review Update (8)
• September 8, 2010 -- Kindle 3 Review Update (11)
• August 6, 2010 -- Kindle 3 Reviews By Online Media (5)

At the moment of this review there are two available screen sizes for Kindle. Small version has 6 inch screen and DX version has 9.7 inch screen. Kindle DX screen is quite large and great for reading text books, magazines, newspapers and books with illustrations. But for other books it could be way too large.

Kindle 3G and Kindle WiFi have screen sizes very similar to small paperback books. Kindle 3G/WiFi screen measures to 3.6 in (91 mm) × 4.8 in (122 mm) which is similar to “sixteenmo” page size (the page size of a book made up of printer’s sheets folded into sixteen leaves, each leaf being approximately 4 by 6 inches). It is great format since it is very compact but at the same time it is limited to how much information will fit to one page. Especially this starts to affect your reading experience when you use font scaling.

Even though page turn times significantly improved from first generation of e-Ink – this operation is still time consuming and besides pressing next page button also requires moving your sight from right bottom corner of the screen back to left top corner on each page turn. And flash of the screen doesn’t add to comfort either. Thus by using e-reader with slightly bigger screen may lead to less tired eyes.

E-readers with small screens may be quite useful for people who read very fast since they can scan through entire lines without moving their sight left and right – since on a small screen you can see entire line in focus. But I think number of folks who can read page diagonally in several seconds is quite limited so I won’t consider this as a significant part of this analysis.

Then there is weight and size issue. I highly doubt that increasing screen size by one inch would significantly impact weight. But many people take Kindle with them while travelling and since current Kindle is very compact it could fit in most of the bags – even small ones (on my travels I usually have 17 inch laptop with me so Kindle weight and size is not an issue in my case). So for those who like to carry Kindle in their handbags increasing size of the kindle even by an inch could cause issues. That’s why having two different models may be helpful.

I personally prefer to read books in slightly larger format than what Kindle currently provides. So if Amazon would offer version of Kindle with 7 or 8 inch screen then I would definitely purchase it. What about you – do you think that Kindle with larger screen would make any difference for you?

Related Posts

• November 29, 2010 -- Kindle on Cyber Monday: Why Kindle Wi-Fi is a good deal (7)
• December 22, 2011 -- Updating Kindle DX or Kindle 2 to Kindle 3.x Firmware (2)
• November 22, 2011 -- Kindle Fire vs Kindle Touch Hands-On: Is The Dedicated eReader Obsolete? (1)
• October 11, 2011 -- Kindle 4 vs Kindle DX: Where To Find The Most Value (5)

Today’s accounts are taken entirely from a university satellite campus in the northwest suburbs of Chicago.  Everybody I talked to was an active user of at least one device in academic settings.

Kindle vs nook:

Kelli, an English Undergrad, said:

I was basically looking at what would save me money on everything I had to use.  I knew I was going to get whichever one I wanted from my parents to help me out, but for books and things I was stuck with student loans.  I narrowed it down to either the nook or the Kindle 3.  They both looked good, but I got the Kindle because they had a thing where you could get ebooks from other places sent to your Kindle by emailing them.  That made things really easy.  It’s a little annoying to have to have to carry around a notebook inside my Kindle case(It looked to me like she had this one), but I doubt any of the others make note taking any easier and I saved a load by getting mostly free kindle books in all my Lit classes.

Kindle DX PDF Reading:

Markus, a Biology Undergrad, said:

My girlfriend got me one of these because she knows I love to read, but I would rather just pick up a book.  It’s just more fun to feel the paper and smell the book.  Last semester, though, I picked it up off the shelf when my printer broke in the middle of printing off articles for class.  One of my profs had the bright idea that sending us lots of articles would save on our book costs.  Apparently cheap laser printers don’t like printing hundreds of pages per hour.  Anyway, I loaded everything I had left onto the DX and decided to make the best of it until they sent the printer back to me.  By the time it finally showed up, I didn’t really case anymore.  This thing is the perfect size for reading pretty much anything, it zooms in on charts and photos, and you never have to worry about where you set down the paper you were halfway through last night.  I still do all my pleasure reading on dead trees, but I tell everybody to try a large screen Kindle.

Kindle for PC and Mac:

John, a Professional Studies Undergrad, said:

I haven’t quite talked myself into getting the physical Kindle yet, though it looks really cool.  Right now I’m doing pretty well using the software Amazon put out for my Macbook.  It’s easy to use and I can save what I was doing and all the notes I took.  Hell, I even go home for the weekend and know where I stopped reading when I use my parents’ computer and can get some homework done.  I tried out the nookStudy software and it was really nice, but I felt like it was just too bulky and tried to do too much all at once.  Plus it kept trying to redownload my books every time I wanted to read them.  What if I want to save some battery life and turn off the wireless connection?!

Kindle DX vs iPad:

Taquisha, an Early Childhood Ed Undergrad, said:

People in the program tried to get me hooked on the Kindle DX for like an entire semester.  It’s cool, the page turning isn’t nearly as horrible as I thought it would be at first, but even when I got one of my own I ended up sending the thing back.  You can’t use something like that when you’re working with little kids.  It’s durable, but they just don’t care.  All it’s good for is hitting stuff with, as far as they’re concerned.  I finally saved up the extra money and upgraded to an iPad and it works much better.  I can play games with them, show little movies, make slide shows, and still be able to just load the Kindle iPad app when I want to read a book.  Everybody was telling me it’d be bad for my eyes, but I just turn it off for a little while when mine get sore and I’m fine.  I’d definitely say to only go for the Kindle if you want to read on it alone.  It doesn’t help at all when you’re working with kids or in groups.

Well, believe me, there’s plenty more.  Kindles, nooks, iPads, netbooks, and even the occasional less popular eReader are becoming staples of the modern college classroom and it’s not likely to change.  The convenience, especially for students with dozens of online articles to read or several huge textbooks to carry from class to class without a chance to set things down, cannot be beaten. I’ll try to come up with some fresh reviews from another campus some time soon.  It’ll be interesting to have some first hand accounts of how these devices stack up as midterms and such put the pressure on their owners.

Related Posts

• December 26, 2011 -- Kindle Content Reviews: Reading, Writing, and Understanding Their Impact (2)
• December 10, 2011 -- Kindle Fire Review Roundup (0)
• December 6, 2011 -- Kindle Fire Wins Over The Family Technophobes (0)
• April 23, 2011 -- How to Productively Criticize High Kindle Book Prices (5)

Wondering what this new influx of Kindles will mean for the reputation of the popular eReading device?  I was too.  Here’s what people are saying:

The Positive Experiences

It appears that many people were put off of eReaders as a whole due to public displays of the Nook’s early poor functionality at Barnes & Noble(NYSE:BKS) outlets.  While this is understandable, given the bumps in the road that the Nook had to make it over to be worthy of a place at the top, it’s good to see people giving these things another try.

Chibacat “Chibs” wrote:

“I enjoy reading so much but my home was being overrun with books! I waited, did not let my friend talk me into buying a Nook last December and I’m glad I did. The Kindle 3 has many aspects I like…books download in seconds, so many books to choose from, free books and books self-published authors on Amazon, I can use the Internet, shop the Kindle store, not be carrying around a ton of books and so much more.”

William J. Mcgaffey wrote:

“I almost was completely turned off on purchasing an e-reader from my experience with the Nook, sure it looked pretty, it had the cool color touch screen at the bottom and a few other nice features but it felt so slow, whenever you turn the page it would flash black and a second or two later the next page would show up. Even the touch screen activity at the bottom of the device felt slow and buggy to me.”  As for the Kindle?  “I pre-ordered it, got free shipping and received it the very next day after it was released! I had already purchased some books for it and when I got it and set up the wi-fi the books were instantly downloaded to the device! As for the actual performance of the device and am very happy with, the page turns are extremely fast, hardly even noticeable! Wonderful battery life, have only had to charge once since I have had it! The new Kindle is an amazing e-reader and would suggest it to anyone who is looking for a superb device and experience!”

There are also some words about the potential use of the Kindle as an Academic tool, something that has often been disregarded due to the highly noticeable differences from working with a paper book or pamphlet.

sunshinediva24 wrote:

“As a PhD candidate who travels a lot and has tremendous amounts of reading to do, I gave the Kindle 3 a shot as a way to be more productive. I was hesitant at first, given what other reviewers had said about difficulty with PDF files. However, after trying it myself and tinkering with the features, I am head-over-heels in love with my Kindle.”

There’s plenty more, of course, but what’s the point of simply quoting over and over again things along the lines of “I love it, I love it, I l0ve it”?  I’ll admit to some surprise that the upgraded web browser is not more commonly reviewed.  Personally, I can’t help but take note of how great it performs and how much of an improvement I’ve noticed over the old version.  That’s just me, however.

Of course, if we’re going to highlight the good reviews then it only stands to reason that some of the bad ones might be relevant as well.  This week’s complaints:

The Negative Experiences

There are two distinct categories that I’m not going to touch on here.

First is defective units.  Yes, there are some.  Fortunately, Amazon seems to be doing a great job getting replacements out.  If you don’t panic, chances are that the worst that will come of any damage in transit or malfunction in your unit is a day or two of waiting.

Second are those reviewers who are blindly lashing out against the product by reviewing something they’ve never even seen in person.  There are plenty of these people to be found on the Kindle review page complaining about everything from lack of informative commercials to not being an Amazon version of the iPad, but you can usually pick them out because they don’t list as having “Amazon Verified Purchase” under their name.  If that’s not there, chances are the person has no real right to be reviewing any given thing on Amazon.

So what are the real complaints?  Well, first and without any surprise is the PDF crowd.  PDF conversion is tedious and complicated at the best of times, and the Amazon automated conversion only works well when you’re really lucky.  Naturally there are complaints.

W. Hall wrote:

“Only problem is my existing PDF books. The text is really small. You have to zoom and navigate. Doable, but not ideal. PDF loading is very easy.”

MisLegend wrote:

“I initially looked into getting a Kindle because I wanted a device to read my PDF text books on other than my net book or printing and binding them.”  “First I e-mailed the PDF file to my Kindle e-mail to have it converted to Kindle format. None of the text came over correctly, it was a bunch of mixed up letters. Then I tried downloading a free converter. While this worked better, the text was super small and you couldn’t really enlarge it to a readable size. (Please note that I can read small print.) Finally I transferred my book to my Kindle using the USB cable”

Long Yang “laolang” wrote:

“I received my order happily. I mainly wanted to use it for reading pdf, science/technology papers and books, which usually have a lot of figures and tables and formula.”  “Perhaps I need to revisit my thinking about DX and IPAD to see whichever is better fitting my reading need.”

There are also concerns about the WiFi.  Many users seem to be having trouble grasping the concept that WiFi-only means that you will not be able to access Whispernet except at hotspots or on your home network.  This can hardly be considered a fault in Amazon or the Kindle, but many are trying to cast it in that light.  Other WiFi complaints revolve around network security.  There IS a known issue wherein WPA2 protected mixed-mode routers will be unable to connect to the Kindle.  In general, if this is a concern, switching to a WEP setup or connecting via USB to your computer seem to be the only options available.

Peter C. wrote:

“It’s a great device but it won’t work with my Cisco E1000 wireless router.”  “I had to return this device and spring for the extra $50 to get the 3G version. I love Kindle. This is my second one – I gave the first one to my lovely wife, who is delighted. Pity about the WiFi.”

Then we have those pleasant individuals who seem to be unable to understand the differences between the traditional LCD screen and eInk.  While I do not personally consider the lack of backlighting as anything but a positive, it is important to be aware of.  This is usually a feature, rather than a failing.  It saves on eye strain and it increases battery life significantly.  That said, word is not quite out yet, apparently.

Pam wrote:

“I don’t remember reading anything about the fact that you couldn’t use it in the dark or I never would have gotten it. There is no way to adjust the brightness or contrast at all. I do 99% of my reading indoors, so being able to see the screen in bright sunlight is irrelevant to me. They sell a lighted cover for it for another $50 – it doubles the weight and runs the battery down fast – two of the pluses I liked when purchasing it (light and one month of battery life). I wouldn’t recommend this over a regular book to anyone.”

And so, that’s where we stand at the moment.  Again, the positive reviews outweigh the negative in number, length, and clarity without it even coming close.  There are shortcomings, of course, and no device is perfect.  People sure do seem to like their Kindles though!

Related Posts

• December 10, 2011 -- Kindle Fire Review Roundup (0)
• December 12, 2010 -- Kindle at College (2)
• September 8, 2010 -- Kindle 3 Review Update (11)
• August 6, 2010 -- Kindle 3 Reviews By Online Media (5)

Kindle 3 Negative Reviews

Beginning at the bottom and working our way up, there are clearly some trends.  One-Star reviews on the Kindle page seem to center on just about three areas, assuming that we’re safe in skipping the complainers who write negative reviews for a product based on it taking too long to get to their house or the fact that they forgot to check to see how much international importation would cost in customs.

1.  Defective Units

As with any product launch, we can expect some problems.  The most vocal will always be those who were the most disappointed.  In this case, it is definitely true that dozens of people received their Kindles in only semi-functional condition due to broken antennae, battery issues, and even broken screens.  What seems to be universally true, however, is that reviewers who have taken the time to follow up have confirmed that Amazon gladly took the bad units back for either refunds or replacements after walking through a small number of steps to troubleshoot and confirm the problems.

2.  Korean Font Issues

It seems that Amazon didn’t choose the best possible option in its default Korean font.  It has been described as blocky, childish, hard on the eyes, difficult to read for any length of time, and just plain ugly.  To the best of my knowledge, this complaint has gone unaddressed as of yet.  It seems likely that it will take at least until the next software patch to get any work done here, so Korean users might be sadly out of luck for the moment as far as default Kindle software goes at the moment.

3.  Software Shortcomings

I’ll be honest, most of this could well come under the category of defective units.  There are a number of users, though by no means a majority, who have been experiencing issues with frequent locking and rebooting for no apparent reason.  These are likely unit failures, given how many reviewers have been offered exchanges, but it’s a pattern to be aware of just in case.  Also, many seem to feel that the PDF support remains insufficient.  Long load times of image-heavy and/or large files have been reported, as well as unwieldy navigation of zoomed documents.  My personal experience does not bear this out, but different people have different expectations or even perhaps still more malfunctioning units given that many of these reviewers simultaneously complain of frequent reboots being required.

Kindle 3 Positive Reviews

In spite of these issues, there is no shortage of praise to be found.  Even without filtering out the many people who have marked down the product for simply not shipping fast enough, the Kindle‘s favorable(4-5 Star) reviews stand at just short of four times the number of all the rest put together as of my writing this.  We’ve already touched on some of these here on the site in our earlier “Kindle 3 Positive Reviews Summary“, but there are a few things to add that really bring it home for a lot of people.

1.  Advertised Features

Yeah, I know, they were right on the packaging.  What did we expect?  The fact is, however, that many people have been taken aback by how much better things like the new screens and WebKit experimental browser are than were originally expected.  I won’t go into this, there are enough ads floating around to find out many details and we’ve certainly talked about new features here enough so far, but these reviews bear out the idea that exaggeration was not a problem on the new Kindle.

2. Setting a New Standard

For many eBook enthusiasts, especially among the early adopter crowd, the Sony PRS-505 set the standard for eReaders until this time.  In terms of weight, durability, screen quality, software, etc, it was simply the best to be had.  Ignore later Sony models, seriously.  According to many reviews, including at least one very well written direct comparison, the only remaining point of shortcoming for the Kindle is the lack of ePub compatibility.  These sorts of comparisons are amazingly valuable for both eBook fanatics and newcomers since they tend to pare down the block of seemingly new and amazing features to what is really going to end up being important over the course of years of use.  If a functional Kindle is now noticeably better than the device that has long been the fallback for users “in the know”, it’s impressive.

3.  The Feel

Now that it’s shrunk down, in terms of size and weight, the Kindle is even more like your average paperback in terms of size and experience.  People are noticing.  If you’ve been on the fence because you’d miss the feel of your favorite book too much, it might finally be time to give it a try.  No more wrist strain, page turn delay that is far less than turning an actual page would be, and a screen that is no longer significantly distinguishable from a paper book in terms of contrast?  Little room for complaint.

Final Verdict

Honestly, I’ll leave that to you.  It is definitely possible to say that this is the best time yet to be buying an eBook reader.  Is the new Kindle sufficiently great to be worth upgrading from the previous generation or your Nook?  Dunno.  Is it good enough for a first eReader?  I’d say it’s an obvious yes, but I’m writing a blog about eReaders so there’s an implied partiality in what I have to say anyway.  Click a link, check the reviews for yourself, maybe ask a few questions if you need to.  I think most people will be pleased.

Related Posts

• August 6, 2010 -- Kindle 3 Reviews By Online Media (5)
• December 22, 2011 -- Updating Kindle DX or Kindle 2 to Kindle 3.x Firmware (2)
• December 10, 2011 -- Kindle Fire Review Roundup (0)
• December 5, 2011 -- Special Offers Now Available For All Kindle eReaders (7)

eReader Comparison: Kindle 2, Nook, iPad, Kindle 1, Kindle 3, Kindle DX, Sony PRS-600

Personally I’m a huge eReader fan and gadget geek as you can see from my pile of eInk hardware. Out of all devices Kindles get the most use: 6″ devices to read books and Kindle DX to read newspapers and magazines. iPad is also used quite a bit but mostly not as eBook reader.

Amazon Kindle 3

Kindle 3 frontal shot. Kindle has a picture viewer easter egg. In order to use it: create “pictures” folder in the root directory of the Kindle USB drive, create some sub-directory there and fill it with pictures. Once in home screen, press Alt-Z to make Kindle 3 rescan picture folders. Subfolders of “pictures” folder that have JPEG, GIF, PNG or BMP files in them will be visible as books and images will become pages. It may be a nice way to enjoy manga on your Kindle 3.

Kindle 3 Back Cover

Kindle 3 back cover has a nice rubbery feel to it that makes the device very comfortable to hold. I has Amazon Kindle logo embossed in it. If you look closely at the slit between front and back covers you will be able to see screwdriver marks from my Kindle 3 disassembly attempt.

Kindle 3 Weight

For some reason Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) has overstated Kindle 3 weight. It really weights around 8.2 ounces as opposed to the official spec of 8.7 as confirmed by multiple sources.

Kindle 3 in Lighted Leather Cover

…

Kindle 3 Light

One of the standard Kindle 3 accessories that Amazon sells separately is Kindle 3 Leather Lighted Cover. It is intended to protect your Kindle from scratches and falls. Although I’ve never field-tested it, judging by it’s solid construction it should do a good job. It also has a built-in LED light for night reading that draws power from Kindle battery via conductive cover hinges. The downside is that the cover doubles the weight of the device.

As you can see, page lighting is not completely even. However from my personal experience I can tell that the cover is completely usable for reading at night. DSLR cameras tend to exaggerate contrast.

Kindle 3 in Leather Cover

When not in use the light slides into the cover and stays completely hidden. There is also leather cover without built in light that costs less and is couple of ounces lighter.

Kindle 3 Power Light

Amazon designers have moved all buttons (except for paging) and connectors to the bottom edge of the device. From left to right you see volume control (for two built-in 1W stereo speaker or headphones used for “Read To Me” text-to-speech feature, listening audiobooks or DRM-free MP3 files), stereo mini-jack headphone connector, microphone (that is not used for anything right now according to the user’s guide), standard micro-USB PC/charging connector, power switch with integrated large charging LED light. The light blinks green when Kindle 3 is turned on or off, glows orange when Kindle is charging and glows green when the device is completely charged.

Kindle 1,2 and 3 side by side

Witness 3 years of Kindle evolution. Kindle 1 released on the 19th of November 2007, Kindle 2 releaed on the 9th of February 2009 and finally Kindle 3 Graphite released recently. Notice the improving progression of screen contrast as eInk displays evolved over time.

Kindle 3 and Kindle 1 side by side

…

Kindle 3 vs Kindle 1 - thickness comparison

Although Kindle 3 and Kindle 1 have very similar footprint in the terms of thickness, Kindle 3 is almost 3 times thinner than the original first generation Kindle.

Kindle 3 and Kindle 2 size comparison

…

Kindle 3 vs Kindle 2 - thickness comparison

Although K3 and K2 are almost indistinguishable by thickness (the difference is 1/50 inch), difference by footprint is considerable.

Kindle 3 and Kindle DX

As you can see Kindle 3 completely fits inside Kindle DX screen with still some room to spare. These are two different classes of devices.

Kindle 3 vs Nook - Size overlay

…

Kindle 3 vs Nook : Thickness comparison

…

Kindle 3 vs Barnes and Noble Nook side by side

Kindle 3 is slightly smaller than Barnes & Noble Nook. It is also almost twice at thin and significantly lighter while packing same 3G + WiFi connectivity. In case of Kindle 3 however you can use free 3G Internet to browse any website rather than just download books.

Kindle 3 and Sony PRS-600 Touch Edition side-by-side

…

Kindle and Sony PRS-600 Touch Edition - Thickness

Kindle 3 has slightly larger footprint than Sony PRS-600 because of keyboard but is slightly thinner and considerably lighter. However the main difference is in display contrast. Kindle 3 Pearl eInk display contrast is almost 5 times higher than that of Sony. This difference has mostly to do with the touchscreen layer in PRS-600.

Kindle 3 vs Apple iPad

Although these are completely different kinds of products I still photographed Kindle 3 and Apple iPad side-by-side just for the fun of it.

I’ll wrap up this Kindle photo review with a daily Amazon.com user review and shipping date check-up:

Right now there are 220 customer reviews for Kindle 3. Of these 155 are completely positive five star reviews, 35 – positive four star reviews, 6 – neutral 3 star reviews, 7 – negative two star reviews and finally 17 – completely negative one star reviews. For the last several days ship date for Kindle 3 remained unchanged as “on or before September 17th”.

BTW: I have plenty of hosting bandwidth so you are welcome to hotlink these pictures.

Related Posts

• June 24, 2010 -- Kindle vs nook: What Do You Get? (14)
• September 10, 2011 -- A Tribute to Michael Hart, Founder of Project Gutenberg (0)
• August 28, 2011 -- What To Consider About A Kindle For College (5)
• July 14, 2011 -- Kindle Tablet to Hit the Market in October (0)

• Original Kindle 3 review (July, 29th) - largely based on official Amazon press release and personal speculations.
• Kindle 3 review round-up from online media (August, 6th) – summary of opinions from sources.
• Kindle 3 review (August, 28th) – my personal hand-on review of the device with battery life estimations, screen contrast comparison, partial disassembly and other useful bits of information.
• Kindle 3 review follow-up (August, 29th) – some minor things I forgot to mention in the original review, comparative screenshot of different typefaces of Cyrillic characters and in-depth look at some of the negative reviews on Amazon.com

This time around I would like to focus on positive Kindle 3 reviews people left on Amazon.com so far. There are 151 positive reviews on Amazon.com out of 168 total reviews right now. Of these 151 reviews, 124 gave Kindle five out of five stars.

Reviews are split almost equally between Kindle 3G + WiFi and Kindle WiFi Only so both versions sell equally well.

I have read though most of the reviews and compiled some numbers which indicate what users like about Kindle 3.

Screen seems to be the biggest hit as it’s mentioned 150 times in all of the reviews. While people who previously owned eReaders mostly note the improved contrast, those who didn’t have eInk device before are very enthusiastic about how comfortable it is for prolonged reading.

Next big thing is the size. There are 94 mentions of how small the device is. Again this aspect is equally appreciated by both long time eBook reader adepts and new converts.

After that comes improved browser with 68 mentions. In this case, positive feedback is mostly in the form of comparing to Kindle 2 “basic web”.

Surprisingly only there are only 43 mentions of weight.

Then come 39 mentions of WiFi, which mostly note speed improvement over previous generation 3G connection and different font options.

There are very few mentions of magazines and newspapers in these reviews (only 7 and 8 correspondingly). Reviewers don’t seem to care much for this aspect of Amazon Kindle. Although personally I never liked dead-tree paper newspapers because they were bulky and messy and get most of my news from online sources it’s still nice to relax and read a well written article in WSJ without the temptation clicking on any of the gazillion links that websites offer.

Here are some quotes from specific reviews that you can check out:

Kindle vs. Nook:

If you’re trying to choose between a nook and a kindle, perhaps I can help. My wife and I bought a nook, a kindle 2, and a kindle DX last month, just days before the kindle 3 was announced. After using them intensively for a few weeks, we returned them and pre-ordered two kindle 3′s, which we have in our hands now. We’ve each read a few chapters and a few newspaper articles on our kindle 3′s and are very happy with them, so far.

K3 is perfect:

The size is absolutely perfect. In the Amazon cover, it is exactly like reading from a paperback book. It’s noticeably lighter and easier to hold for reading, even with arthritis in my hands. The page turn buttons are wonderful. Almost no noise, and you don’t have to push them as hard. It should make it much easier for those with weak or disabled hands. I also like have next page and previous buttons on both sides. I didn’t think it would make a difference to me, but it really does.

K3 Even Better than its Predecessor:

My wife and I share a last gen 6″ Kindle and just received a new 6″ display K3. I know, Amazon doesn’t call it that, but how else can users refer to it? In twenty words or less, it is an improvement over an already excellent product. Smaller, but not too small to be held comfortably. Same size display, but sharper and crisper, better contrast. Easy to use, somewhat smaller keyboard that takes a little, but very little, getting used to. It took me a few hours to stop accidentally pressing some neighboring keys, but now using the keyboard is second nature. And the page turning buttons are silent, but have sufficient tactile feedback, excellent feel.

Enjoy!

Related Posts

• January 8, 2011 -- E Ink Does Well This Holiday Season (0)
• December 4, 2010 -- Kindle 3G vs WiFi Only Review (19)
• August 29, 2010 -- Kindle 3 Review Follow Up (10)
• April 23, 2010 -- Improved eInk Displays (0)

Kindle 3 Weight

I’ve had some time to play around with my new Kindle 3 and to read what other users are saying so now I’m ready to publish this follow up with some of the information I’ve recently gathered of forgot to publish before.

In case you haven’t read reviews I’ve published before, here they are:

• Original Kindle 3 review (July, 29th)В - largely based on official Amazon press release, other online sources and personal speculations.
• Kindle 3 review round-up from online media (August, 6th) – summary of opinions from sources like CNET, PCWorld etc.
• Kindle 3 review (August, 28th) – my personal hand-on review of the device with battery life estimations, screen contrast comparison, partial disassembly and other useful bits of information.

One thing I would like to mention specifically is the weight. I weighted the device on a digital scale it showed 8.2 oz. At first I though that my scale was off but then reports and pictures started surfacing on forums indicating that Kindle 3G + WiFi weights as low as 8.1 oz and Kindle WiFi as low as 7.8 oz. Official Amazon specs indicate 8.7 oz for 3G + WiFi and 8.2 oz for WiFi only version.

Kindle 3 software

Kindle 3 runs software version 3.0 (515460094) and has serial number starting with B006 marking it as new hardware series. No surprise there. In the past Amazon has stopped updating 1.* firmware for first generation Kindles once Kindle 2 came out. Hopefully this is not going to be the case with Kindle software 2.* despite the fact that apparently Kindle 3 will clearly outsell Kindle 2 soon enough (more on that later).

Kindle 3 is much more similar to second generation Kindle than Kindle 2 was to original Kindle 1. Kindle 2 user base now is much larger than Kindle 1 user base was when Kindle 2 came out. It would be easier for Amazon to maintain one code branch than two (since it seems that 1.* software development is essentially non-existent). Unicode characters have been added to 3.0 software. Eventually books in Kindle store will start using these characters. It would be very bad PR for Amazon when people with older Kindles will start buying these books only to see empty boxes instead of characters. This is why I guesstimate that eventually 3.* software will make it to Kindle 2 and older Kindle DX devices. Perhaps it would be software 3.1 or 3.0.1

There are several new features in Kindle software 3.0 that I forgot to mention in the original review:

• Device password. You can set a password that will be required to use the device every time it’s turned on. Without the password it’s impossible to access Kindle UI or Kindle USB drive. It’s pretty useful if you keep sensitive work related documents on your Kindle. In case you forget your password, it is possible to completely reset the device deleting all stored information in the process.
• Collections. Although these are not exactly new and have been around before Kindle 3, I’ve never taken the time to write about them and would like to point this feature out. Historically all Kindle books were piled in one flat list that was sorted by last-read date, title or author. Best way to navigate it was searching. Several months ago Amazon has introduced collections as a way to organize your library. A collection is similar to a tag as one book can belong to several collections (Sci-Fi, H. G. Wells, “Favorite Books”, etc)
• Manually setting device time. Previously Kindle relied on time information from 3G wireless network. Now you can manually set Kindle clock if you have WiFi-only version, don’t have wireless coverage or live on a different time than your GSM provider.

Kindle 3 Unicode support

Kindle 3 finally got a font with broader range of Unicode characters. These include Cyrillic, Simplified and Traditional Chinese, Korean and Japanese. I’ve done some quick tests and to me it looks like characters are there. However I didn’t do a full scale test of all possible characters from these planes. Some people on forums and in comments complained about poor support of Chinese and Korean but so far there has been little specifics.

There were some claims that non-Latin characters display the same in all typefaces. I’ve verified it and it does seem to be true for Asian characters and definitely not true for Cyrillic. Here are some screenshots showing different typefaces in Russian text.

Kindle 3 Russian Typefaces

By the way, good way to download and format Unicode text files so that paragraph breaks would display properly and lines will not needlessly wrap is eBook Text Formatter tool that I’ve created a while ago. It still works great.

Kindle 3 WebKit-based browser

New web-browser in Kindle 3 is great. It can event load and run desktop AJAX version of Gmail (however using mobile version at https://m.gmail.com/ is still recommended as it’s much faster). Some users reported problems with browser or apps. Kindle software would occasionally crash. It is generally believed that it’s caused by background indexing process running alongside browser. Whenever new book, text file or document is downloaded to Kindle, it is indexed to provide almost instantaneous search results. This process is resource intensive and may conflict with web-browser or word game applications that are available for Kindle.

Therefore it is recommended to refrain from browsing while Kindle indexes new books. Usually this process is completed within minutes of downloading a book or a document. If you download hundreds of books at once it may take hours and seriously drain your battery. 75% overnight battery drain has been reported after downloading 100+ books.

In case your Kindle browser stops working completely (“launch browser” button does nothing or causes a crash), restarting your Kindle will fix this problem. To restart your Kindle press “Home”, “Menu”, select “Settings”, press “Menu” and select “Restart”. In case this doesn’t work, holding the power button for 30 seconds and then releasing it does the trick. Please note that Kindle will not restart while you are holding the button. You need to press the button, slowly count to 30 and then release it. Within several seconds your Kindle will reboot.

Kindle 3 User Reviews

For some reason there were no user reviews for Kindle 3 on Amazon website until Saturday afternoon. Perhaps they were held in the pipeline for some reason. Now that reviews are finally in, you can check them out here.

For Kindle 3G + WiFi and Kindle WiFi there are 139 total reviews at the moment. Of these 104 gave Kindle 5/5 stars, 24 gave it 4 stars, 3 gave it 3 stars and 8 people were completely unhappy with their purchase and gave Kindle 3 one star. Since there so few one-star reviews, I took a look at them individually and here’s the scoop:

I would like to start completely quoting review by Roger: “The ipad has so much more functionality, why anyone would want to limit themselves to a Kindle is beyond me.” It doesn’t look to me like Roger ever had or will have a Kindle. Nonetheless he’s entitled to his own opinion and we’ll leave it at that :)

3 people seemed to have received defective devices. I can understand how this can lead to a bad review, however every device has a potential of being defective. When I started building servers of the first batch of 8 HDDs from a major manufacturer 3 failed within 24 hours of stress testing. Bad luck, I guess because since I replaced these 3 and installed dozens more like them I’m yet to see a single hard drive fail. So given the overall volume of Kindles shipped, 3 reviews about defective devices is pretty good.

One reviewer was extremely unhappy with quality of Korean font glyphs. Kindle 3 Unicode support is something that I want to investigate further. I’ll definitely report on it once I have the full story.

There is one bad Kindle 3 review dealing with new smaller buttons. Personally I liked Kindle 2 buttons more as well. New controller layout takes getting used to and judging by scarcity of negative reviews, benefits like WiFi and better screen greatly outweigh discomfort from smaller buttons. By the way there is a good old trick for reading from Kindle without having to use buttons at all: start text-to-speech, adjust the speech speed to your reading speed and then mute the volume. Pages will flip automatically.

User with “Book Worm” alias gave new Kindle 3 one star because he purchased Kindle 2 right before Kindle 3 was announced so the user ended up paying $259 for and older device rather than getting new one for $189. I can completely understand this frustration. Unfortunately Amazon doesn’t have a specific schedule of “surprise” product launches like Apple when everyone expects new iPhone to be announced in Spring and release in the Summer. Such things happened in the past when international Kindle or graphite Kindle DX was released. While it’s unlikely that anything can be done in this particular case, I would like to note that historically Amazon Customer support was quite flexible on 30-day return period. According to comments from several users you can get a refund (if the price dropped) or return your Kindle for a newer one up to one week after 30 days have passed from your purchase. But please don’t tell Amazon that I told you this :)

Final bad Kindle 3 review has something to do with the way user set up his/her account rather than with the device itself so I’ll not comment on it.

For these 8 negative reviews there are 128 positive reviews from people who are mostly extremely happy with their Kindle experience. Some highlights include:

• Small size and weight are mentioned in almost every positive review (and even some negative onces)
• Improved screen contrast and fonts is the second biggest thing mentioned in positive reviews.
• People love new low $189 price point of Kindle 3G + WiFi and $139 of Kindle WiFi.

In the future I’ll do a more detailed analysis of positive reviews and publish the stats here.

Kindle 3 Sales Numbers

On August 25th in the press release announcing early shipments of Kindle 3, Amazon also revealed that Kindle 3 is the best-selling product by four-week sales:

(NASDAQ: AMZN)в_”Amazon.com today announced that more new generation Kindles were ordered in the first four weeks of availability than in the same timeframe following any other Kindle launch, making the new Kindles the fastest-selling ever. In addition, in the four weeks since the introduction of the new Kindle and Kindle 3G, customers ordered more Kindles on Amazon.com and Amazon.co.uk combined than any other product, continuing Kindleв_Ts over two-year run as the bestselling product across all the products sold on Amazon.com.

In the summer and amid slowing economy Kindle 3 was able to beat international Kindle 2 launch that was tied to the holiday shopping season last year. This is quite impressive but not surprising when one considers improved specs and features, price that got slashed in half and amount of customer awareness generated by previous launches.

Related Posts

• November 16, 2011 -- Kindle Touch Review (hands-on) (18)
• November 10, 2011 -- Amazon, Kindle, and Black Friday Deals: Looking Ahead (0)
• June 12, 2011 -- Why Some People Are Annoyed By Kindle Book Sales Numbers (5)
• May 26, 2011 -- Amazon Kindle Now Sells More Books Than Print (0)

Kindle 3 at a glance:

Amazon Kindle 3

Here are the highlights of Amazon’s new Kindle 3 eBook reader:

• Small and light В - 7.5″ x 4.8″ x 0.335″, 8.7oz. In fact it’s one of the smallest eReaders out there and the best one by features by size and weight ratio. Easily fits in a small purse or a coat pocket.
• Sharp and fast 6″ 600×800 eInk screen. The contrast ratio is measurably better (see Kindle screen contrast measurement) that in other eReaders. eInk screen is free of glare and can be read in direct sunlight. There are several options including Leather Cover with LED light and Clip-OnВ Mighty Bright XtraFlex2.
• 3G + WiFi connectivity. Kindle 3 can download books and access Wikipedia via free 3G connectivity in more than 100 different countries. WiFi (when it’s available) allows faster download speeds and connectivity where GSM data is not available. In some countries including US you can also access any website on the Internet via free 3G coverage.
• No computer required. You can buy and download books from the device itself.
• Long battery life. Up to 1 month with wireless off. Up to 3 weeks with WiFi connectivity and up to 10 days with 3G connectivity. You can read as much as you like without having to worry about recharging.
• Text-To-Speech and fully accessible menus via Voice Guide let you listen to the book as it is read and make Kindle 3 a fully accessible device.
• 670,000+ modern books with majority priced under $9.99. These include 107 of 111 New York Times Bestsellers. 1,800,000+ older out-of-copyright books available for free. These include books by Mark Twain, Jane Austen, H. G. Wells and other famous and popular authors.
• First several chapters in any book are available as free sample.
• Books purchased in Amazon Kindle store can also be read on a variety of different devices and platforms including: PC, Mac, iPhone, iPad, Android and Blackberry.
• All books purchased from Amazon Kindle store can be shared among all devices connected to the same Amazon account and read simultaneously.
• Built-in dictionary for instantly looking up word definitions. Alternate dictionaries can also be installed. For example English-Russian dictionary to provide instant translations.
• Native support for PDF, MOBI, PRC, TXT, JPEG, PNG, GIF and BMP files. DOC(X) is supported via online conversion.
• Native support for Cyrillic (Russian), Traditional and simplified Chinese, Japanese and Korean characters.
• Kindle 3 supports Audible (an Amazon subsidiary) audio books and allows bookmarking and chapter navigation. Although it lacks a fully functional audio-player, Kindle can play DRM-free MP3 files as a background music for a book.
• Social features. You can annotate your books, newspapers and magazines and share your annotations and highlights via Twitter and Facebook.
• Kindle 3 features upgraded WebKit-based browser that lets you view almost any website on eInk screen.
• 2 great word games (Shuffled Row and Every Word) with more applications on the way.
• 4 gigabytes of built in memory that can store up to 3,500 books.

Please read on for in depth review of these features and how they compare to Kindle 2 and other eReaders.

Kindle 3 Unboxed:

As usually both cover and Kindle came in Amazon’s signature “frustration free packaging”. You can easily get to your merchandise just with your bare hands without having to use knives or scissors. It is a minor but nonetheless pleasant element.

Latest Generation Kindle 3 and Lighted Leather Cover Unboxed

Kindle 3 Ergonomics:

Kindle 3 Weight

As you can see on our eReader size comparison page, Kindle 3 is one of the smallest eReaders out there. It is also one of the lightest. Although Amazon states 8.7 ounces of weight, actual measured weight is 8.2 ounces. Weighting 8.2 ounces В you can hardly feel it in your hand. Adding another 8 ounces of Leather cover with light to that really feels like a crime. Personally I’m going to shelf the cover at home and only put it on the Kindle while travelling. Amazon really did a great job on the weight and compactness. While Kindle 2 was just the right size to fit into my coat pocket, Kindle 3 fits in it easily with some room to spare.

Power and volume buttons, along with headphone audio jack all moved to the lower edge of the device, leaving all other edges nicely clean. Charging light is now integrated into the power button. Overall this setup is very similar to the original first generation Kindle.

As far a new control layout goes, Lab126 somewhat dropped the ball here in my opinion. Kindle 2 was the ultimate one-handed reader. Jeff Bezos even made jokes about it when interviewed by the media. In Kindle 3, Amazon designers did away with the 5-way controller, replacing it with a 5 button setup that is located much lower. Paging buttons stayed on the same place but became much smaller.

Kindle 3 Symbols Menu

I’m a right-handed person. With Kindle 2 I could hold the device in my right hand and manipulate “Next page”, “Menu”, “Home” and even “Back” button along with the 5-way stick with my thumb. Unless I needed to type an annotation or search for text I never had to engage my left hand. With Kindle 3 paging buttons are still easy to use – you just need to hold the device the same way you did Kindle 2 and slightly rock your thumb to flip pages. Surprisingly I’ve found it easier to to hold Kindle 3 and flip pages with my left hand. 5 navigational buttons along with “Menu”, “Home” and В ”Back” are much harder to reach and manipulate with thumb. It’s not impossible but personally I prefer to hold the device in the left hand and use right hand when I need to look up a word or manipulate a menu.

Given the fact that 97% of time it’s the “Next page” button that you are pressing I would consider it a minor defect, but defect nonetheless.

Unfortunately I don’t have any southpaw friends to provide feedback on Kindle ergonomics for left-handed people so I would be more than interested in comments from my readers in this regard and I’ll surely include them in this and subsequent Kindle 3 reviews.

Alphanumeric keyboard lost the numeric row (same as Kindle DX) so now you have to combine the Alt button with upper “QWERTYUIOP” row to type numbers. Slash (/) button was also eliminated so now you need to press Sym-Right-Right-Right-Ok to produce this symbol. Character table invoked by the “Sym” button got a whole new row filled with digits giving you yet another way to type numbers. On Kindle 3 buttons seem to bulge from the device body slightly more than from Kindle 2, making them easier to press. It is a minor plus but a plus nonetheless.

According to this review, larger charging light is easier for partially color-blind people to read than smaller lights in earlier generation Kindles and other eReaders.

Kindle 3 Screen:

Kindle 3 features eInk Pearl screen. eInk screens don’t have any light source and only require small amount of power to change the picture. Static pictures can stay on the screen forever without draining the battery at all. Since eInk screens are reflective, they can be read from easily under direct sunlight just like regular paper book.

Amazon claims that Kindle 3 has “50% better contrast ratio that any other eReader” and it seems that this claim does have some merit. Although I don’t know which methodology Amazon used in their tests and I’m a amateur photographer rather than a professional colormetrist, I did some measurements of my own and it does look like Kindle 3 beats other eReader in terms of contrast.

Kindle 3 Screen Contrast Test

I took a sheet of office paper and cut a rectangular hole in it to do measurements. Then I created a picture that was half fully black and half fully white. I displayed the picture on several eReaders that I had and photographed both white and black sections of the image covered by paper in such a way that only hole and paper would be in the frame. To make sure that all pictures are created equal I disabled all automatics and post-processing in my DSLR and used flash in manual mode to get consistent lighting. For better accuracy I used 16 bit/color channel resolution. I then blurred pictures to eliminate noise and measured intensities of reference paper, black and white sections of eReader screen in Photoshop. Since light intensity of the same piece of paper differed by less than 1% on all pictures I assume that my measurements were accurate enough. I then calculated white and black intensities relative to reference paper intensity and relative white to black intensity of each reader that represents contrast.

As you can see Kindle 3 is a clear leader in the contrast front with white to black ratio of almost 11. While all eReaders produce comparable white intensities, it is black intensity that really differentiates them and defines contrast ratio. Kindle 3 clearly produces darkest blacks of all devices, followed by Kindle 2 and Nook. It’s white is not as bright as the one one produced by older generation of eInk screen found in Kindle 2 and Nook but overall it clearly wins.

I was quite a bit surprised by Nook performance since I actually expected it to outperform Kindle 2 in contrast department. When I picked it up in the store couple of months ago the first thing that struck me was sharpness and contrast of text. It still looks sharp to me so I guess that it has to with fonts and the way they are rendered on the screen.

Sony PRS-600 touch edition is a clear outsider here – no surprise. Adding touchscreen layer on top of eInk really ruins the image clarity. Now I have actual numbers to back it up.

The new Kindle 3 screen has the same resolution of 600×800 with the same 6″ diagonal, giving it the same 167ppi spatial resolution. This resolution is adequate for comfortable reading at any reasonable font size.

Amazon claims 20% faster page turns. While I wasn’t able to test and accurately measure this metric subjectively it does seem to be true when I compare Kindle 3 and Kindle 2 side-by-side.

Kindle 3 Battery:

Kindle 3 Battery

Although officially Kindle 3 battery is not user-replaceable, it’s very easy to pop the cover off (you just need a thin screwdriver or a knife). Kindle 3 comes with LICO S11GTSF01A 3.7V 1750 mAh Lithium Polymer battery. This is an upgrade compared to 1530 mAh battery by the same manufacturer found in Kindle 2.

According to Amazon it allows up to 1 month battery life with wireless off and up to 3 weeks with wireless on for В WiFi-only Kindle 3 and up to 10 days for WiFi + 3G Kindle.

Buy doing some simple math we can calculate average current drains of about 2.4 mA with wireless completely off, 3.5 mA when running on WiFi and 7.3 mA when running on 3G + WiFi.

Many people are wondering about what would cover with built-in LED light do to the battery life. Luckily I had a digital multimeter and a piece of wire handy so I was able to measure the drain current of the cover as well. It turned out to be 76.6 milliamperes. This by an order a magnitude larger than what Kindle 3 consumes even with wireless on. So with LED light on battery life is going to be between 20.85 and 22.15 hours of constant reading. This is about twice as long as 10 hour battery life of Apple iPad.

Even though the battery is not officially replaceable, it should not be a big problem. Since Kindle can go on weeks without a recharge, this means fewer recharge cycles per year and therefore more years of total battery life.

Another thing worth pointing out is the fact that Kindle 3 would use WiFi network whenever it is available and disable 3G. Depending on how power management is implemented in hardware in software it might be possible to get same 3 weeks battery life on 3G+WiFi Kindle if the device is within WiFi range most of the time.

Kindle 3 Font Options:

Kindle 3 Font Test

With the latest firmware Kindle 3 supports 8 font sizes, 3 typefaces, 3 line spacing settings and 3 line widths. Overall this gives you 168 different ways to display any text. I ran some tests to give get an idea how these settings differ by displaying “The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog” sentence over and over on the same page.

On default settings (Font size #3, regular typeface, large line spacing, default words per line) Kindle screenВ accommodates 221 words. Following table illustrates the effect of different font settings on the number of words per page:

While in my opinion “words per line” setting that was originally introduced on Kindle DX doesn’t make much sense on a small 6″ screen, other settings give users lost of ways to customize their reading experience.

When reading PDF files none of these options are available since fonts are embedded into the files themselves. However there is “contrast setting” with 5 possible values: “lightest”, “lighter”, “default”, “darker”, “darkest”. What it really does is control the weight (boldness) of the font. Is very useful for making small fonts readable without having to zoom into PDF or change screen orientation.

Kindle 3 PDF Support:

Kindle 3 PDF Viewer

Initially PDF native support was introduced in Kindle DX. Back then Kindle software lacked support for zoom and pan so large 9.7″ screen was the only way to deal with documents that are intended for letter size paper (due to the way PDF format works it may be impossible to reflow text in PDF files, although Sony PRS-600 seems to be quite good about it). Since then PDF support was backported to Kindle 2 and after that received several upgrades.

In Kindle 3 you can:

• Zoom and scroll/pan PDF files. One good alternative to zooming is changing screen orientation to landscape and using paging buttons to scroll the page up and down.
• Do dictionary lookups just like with regular books.
• Highlight and annotate PDF files. Although annotations can be shared via Twitter and Facebook users will only see your annotation text but not the portion of the document you’ve annotated. Perhaps Amazon will fix this issue in the future.
• Search within PDF file.
• Change font weight.

You still can’t use any external or internal document hyperlinks or use built-in table of contents. This can be somewhat alleviated by searching for chapter names or using “Goto page number” menu function. Hopefully hyperlinks are also on Amazon’s TODO list.

Overall I can say that compared to “fair” PDF support in Kindle 2, Kindle 3 has “good” PDF support that can become “excellent” some day.

Kindle 3 Wireless Options:

Historically Kindle has shipped with free 3G wireless connectivity. Initially it was available though Sprint CDMA network only in the US. In 2009 when International Kindle 2 was released, Amazon switched to AT&T GSM network with roaming agreements in more than 100 countries.

Kindle 3 comes in two flavors: WiFi Only and 3G + WiFi. WiFi only option is $50 cheaper, slightly lighter and gets one more week of battery life. WiFi + 3G Kindle users the same AT&T 3G GSM network with international roaming as international Kindle but will use protected and unprotected WiFi networks whenever they are available. AT&T bills Amazon around $0.15 per megabyte of downloaded data so it’s a reasonable step for Amazon to forgo this cost while providing users with higher download speeds.

I’ve tested Kindle 3 with AT&T 3G connection and in WiFi mode with my home wireless network and with Sprint EVO 4G in mobile hotspot mode. Every time it worked perfectly. Both 802.11B and 802.11G networks are supported.

People who have mobile hotspot capable smartphones (ex: Android-based phones) may opt for the cheaper $139 Kindle WiFi and still enjoy global wireless connectivity via their phone. Personally I opted for $50 upfront 3G fee for the added convenience always-on connectivity and not having to worry about phone battery charge (mobile hotspot drains phone battery really fast).

Amazon claims 1 week longer battery life for WiFi only Kindle with wireless on compared to 3G + WiFi version. However Kindle 3 would always prefer WiFi connection to 3G so if it is smart enough to completely power off 3G modem when it is not used 1 month uptime for Kindle 3G may also be possible if the device spends most of the time within WiFi range.

It’s also worth noting that there are no separate controls for WiFi and 3G. There is a single menu option “Turn Wireless On/Off” that controls both radios.

Kindle 3 Social Features:

Kindle 3 has the same set of social features as recently released Kindle DX Graphite. You can share highlights and annotations from the books that you read with your friends via Twitter and Facebook. This features also works in newspapers and magazines but not in blogs (it’s a pity since despite doing most of my work on computer I prefer to read blogs like TechCrunch on Kindle if possible)

On top of that Kindle has a kind of social network of its own. You can opt-in to share your book highlights with Amazon. This way passages highlighted by multiple people become highlighted in the book as you read it and made available online. For example you can check out the most highlighted passages from “Eat, Pray, Love” here.

Kindle 3 Web Browser:

Kindle 3 Browser Article Mode

Kindle 3 comes with new WebKit-based web browser that does a much better job at rendering websites than previous browser in Kindle 2. New browser is much faster, more standard compliant and generally better at displaying complex web pages.

When I previously compared Kindle 2 with Nook, Nook was a hands down winner in web-browser department. Websites loaded much faster and nicer than with Kindle 2. In fact some websites Kindle 2 failed to load at all.

Kindle 3 addressed this problem nicely. Previously I would only use Kindle 2 browser as a last resort (if my smartphone wasn’t available) for anything other than Wikipedia. With Kindle 3 I would have to admit that web-browsing is quite usable and fast. In fact with some websites larger screen gives Kindle an advantage over smartphones. I did several side-by-side tests with Nook and found that loading speed was almost exactly the same. It didn’t have any problems even with active javascript content like eReader size comparator.

Another killer feature is “Article Mode”. It is specifically tailored for blogs. When it is turned on Kindle strips away headers, sidebars etc and displays only article content from the page (including images). Since this mode takes away all fancy formating, paging back in forth is extremely fast.

Overall with proper browser, free unlimited 3G Internet and WiFi option Kindle is a clear leader among eReaders when it comes to web-browsing.

Other Kindle 3 Features:

Kindle 3 added native support for several ranges of Unicode characters, including Cyrillic (Russian), Traditional and simplified Chinese, Japanese and Korean. You no longer need to install hacks or convert your books to PDF to read them on Kindle. All you need to do is save text file in UTF8 encoding and copy it into Kindle documents folder. Hopefully Amazon will enable these characters in self-published books soon so international dictionaries including English-Russian dictionary can be properly published.

Kindle 3 Unicode Support (Russian, Chinese, Japanese)

Kindle 3 has 4GB of built-in flash memory with 3.3 gigabytes available for your books, documents, photos and MP3 files. This is an upgrade compared to 2GB in Kindle 2.

Audible audiobooks are supported just as they were in Kindle 2.

Kindle 3 retains all of Kindle 2 Easter eggs, including picture viewer, calculator, minesweeper and gomoku.

There are two word game apps available for Kindle: Shuffled Row and Every Word. More applications are on the way.

Kindle 3 doesn’t have an accelerometer like Kindle DX so page orientation needs to be changed manually.

Kindle 3 Lights and Covers

Kindle 3 is a very lightweight device. Even so accidental drops might break it and the screen is not resistant to scratches. So protective covers are recommended. Although one is not included with the device itself, Amazon offers two models in seven colors each:

Kindle Lighted Leather Cover has a built in LED light. Cover hinges are conductive so the light draws power from Kindle battery. Estimated battery life with the light on is around 21 hours. The cover generally gets good reviews on Amazon. Unfortunately it is quite heavy. At 8oz weight it doubles the weight of the device. Nice thing about this cover is that the light shuts off when Kindle goes to sleep so it will not drain the battery if you leave it on the table and forget to turn off the light.

If you just need the light and not the cover Mighty Bright XtraFlex2 might be the way to go for you. It weights under 3 ounces, runs off 3 AAA batteries and clips-on to almost anything (including Kindle). Although I don’t know exact battery life of this light I can say that I’ve had it for more than a year and it still runs on original Duracell batteries that came with it.

If you want cover but not the light, there is basic leather cover. It is roughly 1.5 ounces lighter, costs $25 less than the one with the light and does a great job protecting your Kindle from scratches and falls.

Kindle 3 Leather Covers

Be aware that Kindle 3 has a different cover hinge configuration from Kindle 2 so covers designed for Kindle will not work.

Kindle 3 Disassembled:

Seeing how easy it is to remove Kindle 3 cover since there are no parts attached to it either outside or inside at all I couldn’t resist the temptation to take it off and snap the following picture (click to see full resolution version).

Here’s a scoop of what I was able to see:

• Battery is 3.7V 1750 mAh 6,47Wh Li-Po В LICO S11GTSF01A branded for Amazon Kindle. Kindle 2 contained 1530 mAh battery so this is a slight upgrade.
• 3G modem is AnyDATA DTP-600W, FCC ID: P4M-DTP-600W, IC : 4594A-DTP600W.
• WiFi card is Atheros AR6102G.
• It uses Wolfson Microelectronics WM8960G stereo codec and 1W speaker and headphone driver chip.

At the moment I didn’t want to dig deeper since I didn’t want to risk accidentally ruining the device before this review is done. I promise to take a better look at what’s inside in the future.

Conclusion:

At $189 price point Kindle 3 is the best value for money eReader on the market. It is a third generation device and Amazon has addressed few issues and shortcomings that previous generations had. At the moment it has the best eInk screen among all eReaders that I’m aware of. It is a a well-polished device that is optimized for reading books and at that it excels. In addition to reading books Kindle 3 provides good experience for browsing the web (especially when one considers the fact that global Internet access is gratis from Amazon), listening to audio-books, and playing simple games.

At $139 Kindle WiFi with the same sharp and high-contrast screen and other features is a steal given wide availability of free WiFi internet worldwide.

While it has some potential for improvement (like any other device), issues like PDF table of contents support can be addressed by a software update in the future.

However don’t just take my word for it – check out what people are saying in their reviews.

Related Posts

• December 22, 2011 -- Updating Kindle DX or Kindle 2 to Kindle 3.x Firmware (2)
• December 5, 2011 -- Special Offers Now Available For All Kindle eReaders (7)
• November 2, 2011 -- Amazon Kindle Special Offers Still Picking Up Steam (0)
• October 10, 2011 -- A Kindle 3 vs Kindle 4 Comparison (6)

PCWorld’s Melissa J. Perenson gave us a good look at the new features.  The expected highlights are all there and duly noted as a greatly improved experience.  She liked how the darker border accentuated the screen, the more comfortable button layout, an improved keyboard, faster page turns, etc.  Things that might not have stood out to most potential users, but that seem to be a big deal in practice, are: the lighter weight of the new design(15% lighter than the Kindle 2, which was itself noticeably lighter than the competing nook device), the rubber backing which greatly increases the comfort of reading one-handed(assuming no case, of course), and the ability to change your preferred typeface.  This last might seem like no big deal to the majority of long-term Kindle owners, but it is a feature that most every other eReader, from LCDs to the nook, has had for a while now.  As far as this review goes, she found absolutely nothing worth listing as a significant downside.

ZDNet’s Larry Dignan also managed to get his hands on one and was kind enough to present some opinions.  One of the things that readers will be pleased to note is that the page turn speed is now, according to this description at least, a complete non-issue.  As he describes it: “Simply put, the Kindle turns pages faster than I can. It’s instant book gratification.”  In addition to this, the 50% higher contrast and the improved design of the physical interface were both deemed worthy of mention as major selling points.  A somewhat surprising note was the improved Webkit browser.  While the convenience of a Kindle‘s browser has occasionally been useful, I don’t think many people would consider it a vital feature for improvement.  Maybe Amazon will surprise some people here.  Dignan’s cited negatives as far as the new Kindle goes concentrate on the format(and really who doesn’t want Amazon to at least support third-party EPUBs at this point?), and lack of apps.  Since we’ve started to see some KDK projects in the form of games become available for public consumption already, it’s fairly safe to say that the latter point is becoming moot.  Is the lack of open format going to be enough to turn most people off of the device?  It seems rather doubtful.  Another reviewer with a very positive look at things.

CNET’s David Carnoy takes a bit of a more speculative view on the device, observing its potential for the future, as much as what it offers at the moment.  As usual, note is made of the improved screen, both in terms of contrast and refresh speed.  The brief note that Amazon has advised their customers that they can return their Kindle 2 purchases for the new model, assuming those purchases were made in the last 30 days, should be fairly useful for some.  He also, fortunately, provides us with some details that have not seen as much attention as perhaps they should.  First, the new Kindle software will, it appears, allow for the reading of password-protected PDF documents.  This will, of course, have an effect on a fairly narrow range of users at the moment, but it will also open up a number of new potential business applications.  Second, the new browser, in addition to being faster and easier to use, will have something called “Article Mode”.  This viewing mode will allow users to cut away everything but the text content on a page for ease of reading and to minimize the necessary page refreshes.  While Carnoy once again cites the arbitrary $99 price point as something Amazon has thus far achieved, this is the only negative he seems able to come up with at this point.

Try as I might, and I did, to find a counterpoint to all this unbridled positivity, nobody seems down on the new release for anything rational.  There’s a small crowd of people complaining that $139 isn’t $99, so Amazon is bad.  There’s also a similar contingent claiming that since it isn’t a color touchscreen tablet, the $500iPad renders it worthless.  Overall, however, this is clearly the most positive, most anticipated, and most affordable addition to the eReader market so far.

Nobody is going to claim that there is nowhere left for eReaders to go, but this is clearly a high point for consumers, with an accessible price point, strong hardware that does its job well, an incredible selection, and the whole Kindle platform as it spreads across nearly every computing device one is likely to get an urge to read on.  It will be worth checking back when the device starts hitting homes and people have more first-hand experiences to talk about, but nobody seems at all hesitant to be impressed.

In case you’ve missed out on our own Kindle 3 review, you can check it out before making up your mind.

Related Posts

• September 8, 2010 -- Kindle 3 Review Update (11)
• July 29, 2010 -- Kindle 3 Released (12)
• December 22, 2011 -- Updating Kindle DX or Kindle 2 to Kindle 3.x Firmware (2)
• December 10, 2011 -- Kindle Fire Review Roundup (0)